08-16-2018  11:02 am      •     
Chaka Fattah
Published: 05 March 2008

The loss of American lives in Iraq and Afghanistan has reached 4,000 in the past five years.
Over the same timespan, almost 10 times that number of Americans, many of them young people brimming with the promise of a brighter tomorrow, have senselessly lost their lives on our city streets, in homes and in neighboring communities from handguns, semiautomatics and other firearms. 
Even more startling: For every homicide by firearms, four other Americans are wounded seriously enough to require treatment in emergency rooms. That equals tens of thousands of near-homicides. In most instances it is just a matter of poor aim and happenstance.
Behind the statistics are heart-wrenching stories. In my hometown of Philadelphia, recent news accounts tell of Antoine Rosenbaum, shot in the back at 23 and paralyzed from the chest down in 2006. He survives, struggling every day, courageously, with the help of his young wife, with questions about mobility, medical bills and his future. 
Then just last month, a teenager tossing snowballs was shot and killed on his 16th birthday by an irate neighbor.
In many societies, when disagreements spiral, people resort to fists or other non-lethal means because guns are outlawed and difficult to obtain. In American society too many people reach for a gun to resolve disputes.
Our cities, states and the Congress are grappling with this problem of too many guns, too many killings by trying to legally regulate, limit and even ban handguns. With the rise of deaths due to these types of weapons — which serve no legitimate purpose — the momentum is building; be it ever so slowly.
On March 18, a case will be argued before the United States Supreme Court – Heller v. the District of Columbia – that could kill even this modest momentum.
At issue is Washington D.C.'s law that bans handguns. An appeals court has ruled it unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. This is the first time that the Supreme Court has revisited the Second Amendment since 1939, when it upheld Congress's right to legislate about guns. Since then the Congress has passed, and Presidents have signed, numerous laws that regulate sales, shipment, use and concealment of all kinds of firearms and ammunition. Cities and states have approved and enforced additional regulations.
I have joined with other members of Congress in an amicus brief that urges the Supreme Court to uphold the District's law and reverse the Appeals court. Such a ruling by the high court would be in line with settled precedent, and it would permit the District as well as the Congress and municipalities nationwide to continue reasonable regulation and control of such weapons.
Our brief argues for understanding what the Second Amendment says – and what it doesn't say. Our founding document ties the right to bear arms directly to maintaining a "well regulated militia" – not to unfettered and unregulated ownership of hand guns.
The brief asserts that since the 1939 Miller case, "Congress has legislated actively to regulate or prohibit the use or possession of certain weapons – mindful of any limitations imposed by the Second Amendment."
Ours is not the only brief urging the Supreme Court to uphold regulation of handguns and other firearms. Mayors, historians, advocacy groups, legal scholars, even former attorneys general and other high ranking Justice Department officials have presented equally compelling legal arguments.
As anticipated, powerful special interests are advocating for a broad interpretation that would allow for unrestricted gun ownership. That is an old story, and it has had tragic consequences across our land.
Gun violence, and the proliferation of handguns, is tearing apart our cities, our families, and our national sense of security. Heller places us at the crossroads. The Supreme Court, when it issues its decision later this spring, can be right on the law and right on ensuring that our streets, our homes and our neighborhoods are safer.

Chaka Fattah is a Democratic Representative from Pennsylvania

Recently Published by The Skanner News

  • Default
  • Title
  • Date
  • Random
  • Newspapers from Maine to Hawaii pushed back against President Donald Trump's attacks on "fake news"Newspapers from Maine to Hawaii pushed back against President Donald Trump's attacks on "fake news" Thursday with a coordinated series of editorials speaking up for a free and vigorous press.The Boston Globe, which set the campaign in motion by urging the unified voice, had estimated that some 350 newspapers would participate.They did across the breadth of the country.The Portland (Maine) Press-Herald said a free and independent press is the best defense against tyranny, while the Honolulu Star-Advertiser emphasized democracy's need for a free press."The true enemies of the people — and democracy — are those who try to suffocate truth by vilifying and demonizing the messenger," wrote the Des Moines Register in Iowa.In St. Louis, the Post-Dispatch called journalists "the truest of patriots." The Chicago Sun-Times said it believed most Americans know that Trump is talking nonsense.The Fayetteville Observer said it hoped Trump would stop, "but we're not holding our breath.""Rather, we hope all the president's supporters will recognize what he's doing —  manipulating reality to get what he wants," the North Carolina newspaper said.On Thursday morning, Trump again took to Twitter to denounce "fake news."He wrote: "The Boston Globe, which was sold to the the Failing New York Times for 1.3 BILLION DOLLARS (plus 800 million dollars in losses & investment), or 2.1 BILLION DOLLARS, was then sold by the Times for 1 DOLLAR. Now the Globe is in COLLUSION with other papers on free press. PROVE IT!"THE FAKE NEWS MEDIA IS THE OPPOSITION PARTY. It is very bad for our Great Country....BUT WE ARE WINNING!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 16, 2018  That followed this tweet from the president: "THE FAKE NEWS MEDIA IS THE OPPOSITION PARTY. It is very bad for our Great Country....BUT WE ARE WINNING!"The Morning News of Savannah, Georgia, said it was a confidant, not an enemy, to the people."Like any true friend, we don't always tell you want you want to hear," the Morning News said. "Our news team presents the happenings and issues in this community through the lens of objectivity. And like any true friend, we refuse to mislead you. Our reporters and editors strive for fairness."Some newspapers used history lessons to state their case. The Elizabethtown Advocate in Pennsylvania, for instance, compared free press in the United States to such rights promised but not delivered in the former Soviet Union.The New York Times added a pitch."If you haven't already, please subscribe to your local papers," said the Times, whose opinion section also summarized other editorials across the country."Praise them when you think they've done a good job and criticize them when you think they could do better. We're all in this together."That last sentiment made some journalists skittish. Some newspapers, including the Wall Street Journal and the San Francisco Chronicle, wrote editorials explaining why they weren't joining the Globe's effort. The Chronicle wrote that one of its most important values is independence, and going along with the crowd went against that. Both the Chronicle and Baltimore Sun said that it plays into the hands of Trump and his supporters who think the media is out to get him.Nolan Finley, columnist and editorial page editor of The Detroit News, spoke up for the press but added a scolding. He said too many journalists are slipping opinion into their news reports, adding commentary and calling it context."Donald Trump is not responsible for the eroding trust in the media," Finley wrote. "He lacks the credibility to pull that off. The damage to our standing is self-inflicted."The Radio Television Digital News Association, which represents more than 1,200 broadcasters and web sites, is also asking its members to point out that journalists are friends and neighbors doing important work holding government accountable."I want to make sure that it is positive," said Dan Shelley, the group's executive director. "We're shooting ourselves in the foot if we make this about attacking the president or attacking his supporters."It remains unclear how much sway the effort will have. Newspaper editorial boards overwhelmingly opposed Trump's election in 2016. Polls show Republicans have grown more negative toward the news media in recent years: Pew Research Center said 85 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents said in June 2017 that the news media has a negative effect on the country, up from 68 percent in 2010.
    Read More
  • The world mourns the death of Aretha Franklin who died today at 9:50 a.m. at her home in Detroit.
    Read More
  • Omarosa viewed as "two-bit opportunist" for calling Trump a racist only after aligning herself with him 
    Read More
  • Seven ships filled with 176,000 tons of wheat have left Portland for Yemen
    Read More
  • It was a rare admission of fault for an administration that frequently skews data and overstates economic gains.
    Read More
  • PP&R activities scheduled outdoors are being moved indoors where feasible
    Read More
  • Trump tweeted a barrage of insults Tuesday morning as Manigault Newman continued promoting her White House tell-all
    Read More
  • Aretha Frankin, considered one of the greatest singers of all time, has fallen ill
    Read More
Oregon Convention Center Job Fair
Port of Seattle Tours

Photo Gallery

Photos and slide shows of local events

Montavilla Jazzfest 2018
The Skanner Report