04 21 2015
  1:31 am  
     •     
40 Years of Service

During election season, rumors, gossip and spin are so thick in the air that they sometimes obscure the truth. So when we heard from several sources that governor candidate Chris Dudley has avoided paying any Oregon taxes, we felt we had to set the record straight.

Dudley paid around $463,000 in Oregon taxes while he was a Portland Trailblazer between 1993 and 1997. He has never denied he moved to Camas after his financial advisor suggested it would save him money. Living in Washington state, which has no income tax, meant Dudley did not pay Oregon taxes on his capitol gains income, investments or endorsement fees. But he came to Portland on a seven-year, $11-million contract with the Trailblazers, and that income was always taxed in Oregon.

In addition, let's mention that Dudley has contributed significant sums to charities in Oregon. During his playing career, the basketball player turned financial manager donated $300,000 to the "I Have a Dream Foundation" to pay college tuition costs for one entire fourth grade class of Vernon elementary school students. His foundation also conducts a basketball camp for diabetic youth. Dudley knows what it is like to deal with the disease, which he has been living with since childhood.

Political ads are spin – not reality. And what 'everybody knows' is often no more than rumor, gossip and partial truth. So question everything and check out the facts with your trusted news sources. That's why we wanted to set the record straight.


Face The Nation Fails The Nation
Bob Schieffer interviewed Karl Rove on Face the Nation, Sunday. I've always enjoyed Schieffer's show, but this week the veteran CBS journalist simply lay down and let the Republican spin czar walk all over him. Rove was given 16 or 17 minutes to pontificate – and he made the most of it: throwing out Republican talking points like wedding confetti. In contrast, Democrat Chris Van Hollen was forced to squeeze his perspective into just 7 minutes.

Anyone who knows me is well aware that I'm hardly a kneejerk Democrat – being naturally skeptical of politicians of any stripe. But I know a skewed debate when I see it – and this was far from fair, balanced or objective.

The airwaves belong to us – we the people – and we lease them to broadcasters in the interests of free speech and democratic debate. In exchange, the networks have a responsibility to the American public. This week Shieffer and CBS failed to meet that standard of responsibility. And they need to hear that, yes: 'We noticed and we care'.



What Do You Think?

Pacific NW Carpenters Union

Commenting Guidelines

  • Keep it clean: Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language
  • No personal attacks: We reserve the right to remove offensive comments
  • Be truthful: Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything
  • Be nice: No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person
  • Help us: If you see an abusive post, let us know at info@theskanner.com
  • Keep to topic: We will remove irrelevant posts and spam
  • Share with us: We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts; the history behind an article

Recently Published by The Skanner News

  • Default
  • Title
  • Date
  • Random
  • When should we use military to enforce US goals? NASHUA, N.H. (AP) — Rand Paul lashed out Saturday at military hawks in the Republican Party in a clash over foreign policy dividing the packed GOP presidential field. Paul, a first-term senator from Kentucky who favors a smaller U.S. footprint in the world, said that some of his Republican colleagues would do more harm in international affairs than would leading Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton. "The other Republicans will criticize the president and Hillary Clinton for their foreign policy, but they would just have done the same thing — just 10 times over," Paul said on the closing day of a New Hampshire GOP conference that brought about 20 presidential prospects to the first-in-the-nation primary state. "There's a group of folks in our party who would have troops in six countries right now, maybe more," Paul said. Foreign policy looms large in the presidential race as the U.S. struggles to resolve diplomatic and military conflicts across the globe. The GOP presidential class regularly rails against President Barack Obama's leadership on the world stage, yet some would-be contenders have yet to articulate their own positions, while others offered sharply different visions. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, whose brother, President George W. Bush, authorized the 2003 invasion of Iraq, declined to say whether he would have done anything different then. Yet Jeb Bush acknowledged a shift in his party against new military action abroad. "Our enemies need to fear us, a little bit, just enough for them to deter the actions that create insecurity," Bush said earlier in the conference. He said restoring alliances "that will create less likelihood of America's boots on the ground has to be the priority, the first priority of the next president." The GOP's hawks were well represented at the event, led by Florida Sen. Marco Rubio and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who has limited foreign policy experience but articulated a muscular vision during his Saturday keynote address. Walker said the threats posed by radical Islamic terrorism won't be handled simply with "a couple bombings." "We're not going to wait till they bring the fight to us," Walker said. "We're going to bring the fight to them and fight on their soil." South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham addressed the question of putting U.S. troops directly in the battle against the Islamic State group militants by saying there is only one way to defeat the militants: "You go over there and you fight them so they don't come here." Texas Sen. Ted Cruz suggested an aggressive approach as well. "The way to defeat ISIS is a simple and clear military objective," he said. "We will destroy them." Businesswoman Carly Fiorina offered a similar outlook. "The world is a more dangerous and more tragic place when America is not leading. And America has not led for quite some time," she said. Under Obama, a U.S.-led coalition of Western and Arab countries is conducting regular airstrikes against Islamic State targets in Iraq and Syria. The U.S. also has hundreds of military advisers in Iraq helping Iraqi security forces plan operations against the Islamic State, which occupies large chunks of northern and western Iraq. Paul didn't totally reject the use of military force, noting that he recently introduced a declaration of war against the Islamic State group. But in an interview with The Associated Press, he emphasized the importance of diplomacy. He singled out Russia and China, which have complicated relationships with the U.S., as countries that could contribute to U.S. foreign policy interests. "I think the Russians and the Chinese have great potential to help make the world a better place," he said. "I don't say that naively that they're going to, but they have the potential to." Paul suggested the Russians could help by getting Syrian President Bashar Assad to leave power. "Maybe he goes to Russia," Paul said. Despite tensions with the U.S., Russia and China negotiated alongside Washington in nuclear talks with Iran. Paul has said he is keeping an open mind about the nuclear negotiations. "The people who already are very skeptical, very doubtful, may not like the president for partisan reasons," he said, and "just may want war instead of negotiations."
    Read More
  • Some lawmakers, sensing a tipping point, are backing the parents and teachers who complain about 'high stakes' tests   
    Read More
  • Watch Rachel Maddow interview VA Secretary Robert McDonald  
    Read More
  • Some two thousand people pack halls to hear Trayvon Martin's mom speak   
    Read More
load morehold SHIFT key to load allload all
Carpentry Professionals

PHOTO GALLERY

Calendar

About Us

Breaking News

The Skanner TV

Turn the pages

Hood to Coast
The Skanner Photo Archives