04 21 2015
  4:51 am  
40 Years of Service

(NNPA) - Is the passage of health care reform a foregone conclusion? At this writing, Democrats lack enough votes in the House of Representatives to pass even a watered-down version of the initial legislation because, on the left, there is opposition to the absence of a public option and because, on the right, there are objections to market manipulations.
Still, between Speaker Nancy Pelosi's commitment and President Obama's high-risk brinksmanship on this issue, it is likely that some form of health care reform will be voted in before the end of this month. It won't be enough to satisfy some, and too much for the taste of others, and yet it will be a step forward in the quest to make health care a right, not a privilege, something that progressives have been advocating for decades.
Once this legislation is negotiated, what's next? There is a national clamoring for legislation that will address the employment situation, and president Obama has indicated his willingness to look at jobs. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's proposed legislation that offers a scant $15 billion in tax breaks for business is not exactly job creation legislation. What really needs to happen is that, failing other options, our nation needs to look at federally generated or provided jobs, with administration coming from cities, not from the states. Channeling funds to cities allows the federal government to indirectly target the high unemployment people of color who have shouldered much of this national unemployment burden.
The 9.7 percent unemployment rate is an understated fiction. The "real" unemployment rate, which includes discouraged workers and those who work part time instead of full time, is closer to 16.5 percent. The African American unemployment rate, reported at 16.7 percent, is closer to 29 percent when discouraged workers and others are included. Last month, the Black male unemployment rate roes, while the White male rate dropped. If we are all in the same boat of this national unemployment crisis, some folks are riding and others are rowing. African American men might be hanging on the oars, struggling.
After jobs legislation is managed, it also makes sense for this administration to look at the consumer protection agency it has proposed. Some would like to see this agency located inside the Federal Reserve, but that makes no sense. That is much like asking Al Capone to guard Fort Knox. Instead, a freestanding agency will allow those who protect consumers much-needed independence. Unfortunately, some of the members of Congress who agree that consumer protection is necessary have been persuaded that a good location for the agency might be the Federal Reserve.
The environment and global warming issues must be addressed by this administration. Months after the UN Copenhagen meetings on global warming, other concerns have rendered the Obama Administration virtually mute on climate matters. With Earth Day coming up on April 22, it would be great if the administration could step up to promises it made in Copenhagen and commit to reducing our nation's carbon footprint.
International concerns are as important as the domestic concerns of health, jobs, consumer protection and the environment. We are in two wars, in Afghanistan and in Iraq. Thousands of American lives have been lost thanks to the pointless aggressive policies of the Bush Administration. Hundreds of thousands of American soldiers are at risk in Iraq and Afghanistan, and our policies toward these countries, despite pronouncements, seem little changed from our policies in the Bush years. If you walk down Pennsylvania past the White House, there is a tall, grey-bearded man with a pink sign singing and humming us out of Iraq. He is almost a fixture – he (or someone who looks very much like him) has been standing in that same spot for more than a year. The Obama Administration cannot exhale when health care reform legislation passes. Indeed, the time and effort put into health care have resulted in a backlog of issues that must be addressed. With a forecast that unemployment rates will not drop to 6 percent before 2015, the focus for the spring must be jobs, jobs, jobs.

Julianne Malveaux is President of Bennett College for Women. She can be reached at presbennett@bennett.edu

Pacific NW Carpenters Union

Commenting Guidelines

  • Keep it clean: Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language
  • No personal attacks: We reserve the right to remove offensive comments
  • Be truthful: Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything
  • Be nice: No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person
  • Help us: If you see an abusive post, let us know at info@theskanner.com
  • Keep to topic: We will remove irrelevant posts and spam
  • Share with us: We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts; the history behind an article

Recently Published by The Skanner News

  • Default
  • Title
  • Date
  • Random
  • When should we use military to enforce US goals? NASHUA, N.H. (AP) — Rand Paul lashed out Saturday at military hawks in the Republican Party in a clash over foreign policy dividing the packed GOP presidential field. Paul, a first-term senator from Kentucky who favors a smaller U.S. footprint in the world, said that some of his Republican colleagues would do more harm in international affairs than would leading Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton. "The other Republicans will criticize the president and Hillary Clinton for their foreign policy, but they would just have done the same thing — just 10 times over," Paul said on the closing day of a New Hampshire GOP conference that brought about 20 presidential prospects to the first-in-the-nation primary state. "There's a group of folks in our party who would have troops in six countries right now, maybe more," Paul said. Foreign policy looms large in the presidential race as the U.S. struggles to resolve diplomatic and military conflicts across the globe. The GOP presidential class regularly rails against President Barack Obama's leadership on the world stage, yet some would-be contenders have yet to articulate their own positions, while others offered sharply different visions. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, whose brother, President George W. Bush, authorized the 2003 invasion of Iraq, declined to say whether he would have done anything different then. Yet Jeb Bush acknowledged a shift in his party against new military action abroad. "Our enemies need to fear us, a little bit, just enough for them to deter the actions that create insecurity," Bush said earlier in the conference. He said restoring alliances "that will create less likelihood of America's boots on the ground has to be the priority, the first priority of the next president." The GOP's hawks were well represented at the event, led by Florida Sen. Marco Rubio and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who has limited foreign policy experience but articulated a muscular vision during his Saturday keynote address. Walker said the threats posed by radical Islamic terrorism won't be handled simply with "a couple bombings." "We're not going to wait till they bring the fight to us," Walker said. "We're going to bring the fight to them and fight on their soil." South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham addressed the question of putting U.S. troops directly in the battle against the Islamic State group militants by saying there is only one way to defeat the militants: "You go over there and you fight them so they don't come here." Texas Sen. Ted Cruz suggested an aggressive approach as well. "The way to defeat ISIS is a simple and clear military objective," he said. "We will destroy them." Businesswoman Carly Fiorina offered a similar outlook. "The world is a more dangerous and more tragic place when America is not leading. And America has not led for quite some time," she said. Under Obama, a U.S.-led coalition of Western and Arab countries is conducting regular airstrikes against Islamic State targets in Iraq and Syria. The U.S. also has hundreds of military advisers in Iraq helping Iraqi security forces plan operations against the Islamic State, which occupies large chunks of northern and western Iraq. Paul didn't totally reject the use of military force, noting that he recently introduced a declaration of war against the Islamic State group. But in an interview with The Associated Press, he emphasized the importance of diplomacy. He singled out Russia and China, which have complicated relationships with the U.S., as countries that could contribute to U.S. foreign policy interests. "I think the Russians and the Chinese have great potential to help make the world a better place," he said. "I don't say that naively that they're going to, but they have the potential to." Paul suggested the Russians could help by getting Syrian President Bashar Assad to leave power. "Maybe he goes to Russia," Paul said. Despite tensions with the U.S., Russia and China negotiated alongside Washington in nuclear talks with Iran. Paul has said he is keeping an open mind about the nuclear negotiations. "The people who already are very skeptical, very doubtful, may not like the president for partisan reasons," he said, and "just may want war instead of negotiations."
    Read More
  • Some lawmakers, sensing a tipping point, are backing the parents and teachers who complain about 'high stakes' tests   
    Read More
  • Watch Rachel Maddow interview VA Secretary Robert McDonald  
    Read More
  • Some two thousand people pack halls to hear Trayvon Martin's mom speak   
    Read More
load morehold SHIFT key to load allload all
Carpentry Professionals



About Us

Breaking News

The Skanner TV

Turn the pages

Portland Opera Showboat 2
The Skanner Photo Archives