02-19-2017  3:20 pm      •     

One does not have to agree with former President Jimmy Carter on everything in order to appreciate the wisdom and courage of his stand on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. His most recent efforts to reach out to the Palestinian Islamist resistance movement Hamas are a case in point.
Contrary to the viewpoint of both the Bush administration and in the Israeli government, former President Carter has consistently recognized that in order for there to be lasting peace coupled with justice in the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, all of the major parties must be at the table. If any significant party is excluded — for example U.S. and Israeli efforts to exclude Hamas — that will inevitably mean that efforts at a solution will be undermined over time. Flowing from such an analysis, Carter took steps to reach out to Hamas in order to advance a dialogue. A dialogue does not mean that one necessarily agrees with the point of view of either side. Rather, it represents a recognition that there IS another side, and that this side must be heard in order for a problem to be resolved. For these reasons it is very important that we, in Black America, make our support for former President Carter known and heard.
From Carter's dialogue with Hamas came the Hamas declaration of a commitment to a 10-year truce with Israel, should Israel return to the pre-June 1967 boundaries. In other words, Hamas is asking that Israel comply with the United Nations resolutions that have been passed since the Occupation began. The reply from the Israeli government and the Bush administration has been to cast scorn on this announcement and claim that it is more of the same. Rather than building upon Carter's initiative, both the Israeli government and the Bush administration wish to see it shrivel into nothingness.
What lies behind the Israeli government/Bush administration response is an effort to crush Hamas and to ensure that there is a compliant Palestinian government in power to administer the few spaces of land that the Palestinians will be allowed to "control" should the Israeli government get its way. 
They are hoping that the administration of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas will be such a compliant puppet. There are many Palestinian organizations that disagree with President Abbas, in addition to disagreeing with the Israelis and the Bush administration on how to proceed. Hamas is one of the more significant of such organizations. 
It is also the one that WON democratic elections held in 2006. It was this victory that the Bush administration, according to Vanity Fair magazine, attempted to overturn through a planned pro-Abbas coup. The coup did not happen, but Hamas ended up launching its own assault, and took over the Gaza territory.
The suggestion that Hamas should be ignored because it engages in alleged terrorist activity is as ridiculous as it is a-historical. If one reviews the history of the founding of Israel, for instance, one immediately discovers that Zionist military operations against the British AND Arabs included guerrilla warfare AND terrorist activity. Probably the most well-known of the Zionist terrorist operations was the bombing of the King David Hotel. In addition, there were ethnic cleansing operations against Arabs, with one of the most notorious being the massacre at Deir Yassin. How, then, can someone argue that those who are using military means, even if one deplores such means, should be ignored? If that is the argument, then the United States should have joined with the British in 1947 in militarily crushing the Zionist military units. That did not happen, and my guess is that no one in the Bush administration would argue that such a course of action would have been correct.
Former President Carter has taken an important step, recognizing that the situation in the Middle East generally, and between the Israelis and Palestinians in particular, is not improving, but is going from bad to worse. One does not need to believe in the predictions of Nostradamus to recognize that a failure to bring about peace and justice between these groups could devolve into a regional, if not global conflict. Carter was and is correct to take such steps, and he needs our support.

Bill Fletcher, Jr. is a senior scholar with the Institute for Policy Studies and is the immediate past president of TransAfrica Forum.

Recently Published by The Skanner News

  • Default
  • Title
  • Date
  • Random
  • WASHINGTON (AP) — One month after the inauguration, the stretch of Pennsylvania Avenue in front of Donald Trump's White House still is a hard-hat zone. Skeletal remains of the inaugural reviewing stands poke skyward. Random piles of plywood and cables are heaped on the ground inside crooked lines of metal fencing. The disarray outside the president's front door, though not his fault, serves as a metaphor for the tumult still unfolding inside. Four weeks in, the man who says he inherited "a mess" at home and abroad is presiding over a White House that is widely described as itself being a mess. At a stunning pace, Trump has riled world leaders and frustrated allies. He was dealt a bruising legal blow on one of his signature policies. He lost his national security adviser and his pick for labor secretary to scandal. He's seen forces within his government push back against his policies and leak confidential information. All of this has played out amid a steady drip of revelations about an FBI investigation into his campaign's contacts with Russian intelligence officials. Trump says his administration is running like a "fine-tuned machine." He points to the rising stock market and the devotion of his still-loyal supporters as evidence that all is well, although his job approval rating is much lower than that for prior presidents in their first weeks in office. Stung by the unrelenting criticism coming his way, Trump dismisses much of it as "fake news" delivered by "the enemy of the people" — aka the press. Daily denunciations of the media are just one of the new White House fixtures Americans are adjusting to. Most days start (and end) with presidential tweets riffing off of whatever's on TV talk shows or teasing coming events or hurling insults at the media. At some point in the day, count on Trump to cast back to the marvels of his upset of Democrat Hillary Clinton in the November election and quite possibly overstate his margins of support. Expect more denunciations of the "dishonest" press and its "fake news." From there, things can veer in unexpected directions as Trump offers up policy pronouncements or offhand remarks that leave even White House aides struggling to interpret them. The long-standing U.S. policy of seeking a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Trump this past week offered this cryptic pronouncement: "I'm looking at two-state and one-state, and I like the one that both parties like. I can live with either one." His U.N. ambassador, Nikki Haley, the next day insisted, "We absolutely support a two-state solution." Trump's days are busy. Outside groups troop in for "listening sessions." Foreign leaders call or come to visit. (Or, in the case of Mexico's president, cancel out in pique over Trump's talk about the planned border wall.) After the president signed two dozen executive actions, the White House was awaiting a rush order of more of the gold-plated Cross pens that Trump prefers to the chrome-plated ones used by his predecessor. Trump hands them out as souvenirs at the signing ceremonies that he points to as evidence of his ambitious pace. "This last month has represented an unprecedented degree of action on behalf of the great citizens of our country," Trump said at a Thursday news conference. "Again, I say it. There has never been a presidency that's done so much in such a short period of time." That's all music to the ears of his followers, who sent him to Washington to upend the established order and play the role of disrupter. "I can't believe there's actually a politician doing what he says he would do," says an approving Scott Hiltgen, a 66-year-old office furniture sales broker from River Falls, Wisconsin. "That never happens." Disrupt Trump has. But there may be more sound and fury than substance to many of his early actions. Trump did select Judge Neil Gorsuch to replace the late Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court, a nomination that has drawn strong reviews from conservatives. But the president is regrouping on immigration after federal judges blocked his order to suspend the United States' refugee program and ban visitors from seven Muslim-majority countries, which had caused chaos for travelers around the globe. Some other orders on issues such as the U.S.-Mexico border wall and former President Barack Obama's health care law are of limited effect. Trump says his early actions show he means to deliver on the promises he made during the campaign. "A lot of people say, 'Oh, oh, Trump was only kidding with the wall,'" the president told a group of police chiefs recently. "I wasn't kidding. I don't kid." But the Republican-led Congress is still waiting to see specifics on how Trump wants to proceed legislatively on top initiatives such as replacing the health care law, enacting tax cuts and revising trade deals. The messy rollout of the travel ban and tumult over the ouster of national security adviser Michael Flynn for misrepresenting his contacts with Russia are part of a broader state of disarray as different figures in Trump's White House jockey for power and leaks reveal internal discord in the machinations of the presidency. "I thought by now you'd at least hear the outlines of domestic legislation like tax cuts," says Princeton historian Julian Zelizer. "But a lot of that has slowed. Trump shouldn't mistake the fact that some of his supporters like his style with the fact that a lot of Republicans just want the policies he promised them. He has to deliver that." Put Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., in the camp of those more interested in substance than style. "I'm not a great fan of daily tweets," McConnell said Friday, referring to the "extra discussion" that Trump likes to engage in. But McConnell was quick to add: "What I am a fan of is what he's been actually doing." He credits Trump with assembling a conservative Cabinet and taking steps to reduce government regulation, and promised: "We like his positions and we're going to pursue them as vigorously as we can." The challenge may be to tease out exactly what Trump wants in the way of a health care plan, tax changes and trade policy. At his long and defiant news conference on Thursday, Trump tried to dispel the impression of a White House in crisis, squarely blaming the press for keeping him from moving forward more decisively on his agenda. Pointing to his chief of staff, Reince Priebus, Trump said, "You take a look at Reince, he's working so hard just putting out fires that are fake fires. I mean, they're fake. They're not true. And isn't that a shame because he'd rather be working on health care, he'd rather be working on tax reform." For all the frustrations of his early days as president, Trump still seems tickled by the trappings of his office. When New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie visited the White House last week to discuss the national opioid epidemic over lunch, the governor said Trump informed him: "Chris, you and I are going to have the meatloaf.'" Trump added: "I'm telling you, the meatloaf is fabulous." ___Follow Nancy Benac on Twitter at http://twitter.com/nbenac
    Read More
  • FDR executive order sent 120,000 Japanese immigrants and citizens into camps
    Read More
  • Pruitt's nomination was strongly opposed by environmental groups and hundreds of former EPA employees
    Read More
load morehold SHIFT key to load allload all
Carpentry Professionals


Reed College Jobs
His Eye is on the Sparrow