04 21 2015
  1:18 am  
     •     
40 Years of Service

Poverty in America Means 'Sink Or Swim' For Many

 

The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was 36 years old when he preached "The American Dream" sermon as co-pastor of Ebenezer Baptist Church on Sunday, July 4, 1965.

"You can get so busy in life that you forget holidays and other days, and it had slipped my mind altogether that today was the Fourth of July," King said that day. "...And I think when I get to Atlanta and go to my pulpit, I will try to preach a sermon in the spirit of the founding fathers of our nation and in the spirit of the Declaration of Independence. And so this morning I would like to use as a subject from which to preach: 'The American Dream.' "

In Congress, on July 4, 1776, the Declaration of Independence proclaimed, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

On Wednesday, July 4, how many of our families, friends, neighbors, grandparents and great-grandparents were experiencing "The American Dream" 42 years after Dr. King's sermon on Sunday, July 4, 1965?

In fact, more than four decades later, Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards just released his book "Ending Poverty in America, how to restore the American dream."

Dr. King said, "There is nothing new about poverty. What is new is that we now have the techniques and the resources to get rid of poverty. The real question is whether we have the will."

Edwards, as director of the Center on Poverty, Work and Opportunity at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, developed a series of ideas and theories about how the nation should actively pursue ending poverty by 2036.

In September 2004, the AARP Public Policy Institute Policy and Research released a report on African-Americans age 65 and older. Incidentally, they represent our community's grandparents and great-grandparents born before 1942. The economic security of those 65 and older has improved over the last 30-plus years. Poverty rates for this age group fell from 28.5 percent in 1966 to 10.4 percent in 2002.

But the portion of African American women who fall below poverty and near poverty is significantly higher than the portion for all older persons. Almost 28 percent of African American women 65 and older live below poverty, 39 percent live below 125 percent of poverty and almost half of older African American women live below 150 percent of poverty.

African Americans receive relatively little income from other sources (except, notably, older African American men's pensions) other than Social Security. For African Americans age 65 and older, Social Security continues to be the primary source of retirement income security.

Post-Katrina images were swept from under America's political rug with high-profile media reports of inequalities. The causes and consequences of poverty glaringly tell two stories of responsibility to secure our own economic empowerment.

The government, where required, and our own, where necessary.

It is time to "Sink Or Swim" while moving forward to turn the tide of poverty when history has validated that we have the imagination, vision, intellect, innovation, perseverance and action of great kings and queens -- our mothers and fathers of science, medicine and inventors blood coursing through our veins.

Despite all the pictures of the Katrina aftermath, we have success stories in Black America that are glaring examples of what is possible "only in America."

That is why we will not wait to end poverty by 2036.

Our mission is to build and launch the next generation of the economy's solutions to positively contribute to the economic, political and social fabric of our communities, city and state and ultimately improve the lives of the entire nation today.

"Sing a song full of the faith that the dark past has taught us,

Sing a song full of the hope that the present has brought us;

Facing the rising sun of our new day begun,

Let us march on 'til victory is won."

 

Dr. Farrah Gray is the author of the international best-seller "Reallionaire: Nine Steps to Becoming Rich from the Inside Out." He is chairman of the Farrah Gray Foundation.

Pacific NW Carpenters Union

Commenting Guidelines

  • Keep it clean: Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language
  • No personal attacks: We reserve the right to remove offensive comments
  • Be truthful: Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything
  • Be nice: No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person
  • Help us: If you see an abusive post, let us know at info@theskanner.com
  • Keep to topic: We will remove irrelevant posts and spam
  • Share with us: We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts; the history behind an article

Recently Published by The Skanner News

  • Default
  • Title
  • Date
  • Random
  • When should we use military to enforce US goals? NASHUA, N.H. (AP) — Rand Paul lashed out Saturday at military hawks in the Republican Party in a clash over foreign policy dividing the packed GOP presidential field. Paul, a first-term senator from Kentucky who favors a smaller U.S. footprint in the world, said that some of his Republican colleagues would do more harm in international affairs than would leading Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton. "The other Republicans will criticize the president and Hillary Clinton for their foreign policy, but they would just have done the same thing — just 10 times over," Paul said on the closing day of a New Hampshire GOP conference that brought about 20 presidential prospects to the first-in-the-nation primary state. "There's a group of folks in our party who would have troops in six countries right now, maybe more," Paul said. Foreign policy looms large in the presidential race as the U.S. struggles to resolve diplomatic and military conflicts across the globe. The GOP presidential class regularly rails against President Barack Obama's leadership on the world stage, yet some would-be contenders have yet to articulate their own positions, while others offered sharply different visions. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, whose brother, President George W. Bush, authorized the 2003 invasion of Iraq, declined to say whether he would have done anything different then. Yet Jeb Bush acknowledged a shift in his party against new military action abroad. "Our enemies need to fear us, a little bit, just enough for them to deter the actions that create insecurity," Bush said earlier in the conference. He said restoring alliances "that will create less likelihood of America's boots on the ground has to be the priority, the first priority of the next president." The GOP's hawks were well represented at the event, led by Florida Sen. Marco Rubio and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who has limited foreign policy experience but articulated a muscular vision during his Saturday keynote address. Walker said the threats posed by radical Islamic terrorism won't be handled simply with "a couple bombings." "We're not going to wait till they bring the fight to us," Walker said. "We're going to bring the fight to them and fight on their soil." South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham addressed the question of putting U.S. troops directly in the battle against the Islamic State group militants by saying there is only one way to defeat the militants: "You go over there and you fight them so they don't come here." Texas Sen. Ted Cruz suggested an aggressive approach as well. "The way to defeat ISIS is a simple and clear military objective," he said. "We will destroy them." Businesswoman Carly Fiorina offered a similar outlook. "The world is a more dangerous and more tragic place when America is not leading. And America has not led for quite some time," she said. Under Obama, a U.S.-led coalition of Western and Arab countries is conducting regular airstrikes against Islamic State targets in Iraq and Syria. The U.S. also has hundreds of military advisers in Iraq helping Iraqi security forces plan operations against the Islamic State, which occupies large chunks of northern and western Iraq. Paul didn't totally reject the use of military force, noting that he recently introduced a declaration of war against the Islamic State group. But in an interview with The Associated Press, he emphasized the importance of diplomacy. He singled out Russia and China, which have complicated relationships with the U.S., as countries that could contribute to U.S. foreign policy interests. "I think the Russians and the Chinese have great potential to help make the world a better place," he said. "I don't say that naively that they're going to, but they have the potential to." Paul suggested the Russians could help by getting Syrian President Bashar Assad to leave power. "Maybe he goes to Russia," Paul said. Despite tensions with the U.S., Russia and China negotiated alongside Washington in nuclear talks with Iran. Paul has said he is keeping an open mind about the nuclear negotiations. "The people who already are very skeptical, very doubtful, may not like the president for partisan reasons," he said, and "just may want war instead of negotiations."
    Read More
  • Some lawmakers, sensing a tipping point, are backing the parents and teachers who complain about 'high stakes' tests   
    Read More
  • Watch Rachel Maddow interview VA Secretary Robert McDonald  
    Read More
  • Some two thousand people pack halls to hear Trayvon Martin's mom speak   
    Read More
load morehold SHIFT key to load allload all
Carpentry Professionals

PHOTO GALLERY

Calendar

About Us

Breaking News

The Skanner TV

Turn the pages

Portland Opera Showboat 2
The Skanner Photo Archives