02-19-2017  6:06 pm      •     

Integration Died Long Before the Supreme Court Ruling


The cover of Time magazine says it all, "Back to Segregation: After four decades of struggle, America has now given up on integration. Why?" The article states, "In fact, the high court's action has accelerated the pace at which cities across the country are moving to undo mandatory desegregation. And the federal judiciary, which long staked its authority on the enforcement of desegregation orders, appears eager to depart the field."

Chris Hansen of the American Civil Liberties Union in New York City is quoted as saying, "The courts are saying, 'We still agree with the goal of school desegregation, but it's too hard, and we're tired of it, and we give up.' "

The article observes, "The combination of legal revisionism and residential segregation is effectively ending America's bold attempt to integrate the public schools."

Kevin Brown, a law professor at the University of Indiana and an expert on race and education, said, "We have already seen the maximum amount of racial mixing in public schools that will exist in our lifetime."

Were these fresh reactions to last week's Supreme Court setback severely restricting the use of race in the assignment of students to public schools in Seattle and Louisville? No. The above quotes were taken from the April 29, 1996 issue of Time magazine – more than 11 years ago. In essence, desegregation of public elementary and high schools was abandoned long before the Roberts court ruling put yet another nail in the coffin of integration.

The cruel irony is that at a time when the United States is rapidly becoming more racially and ethnically diverse -- in less than 50 years, Whites will become a minority in this country -- the judicial system is mandating a more segregated society.

Conservatives will no doubt hail desegregation as another failed American experiment. That's far from the truth. Like the War on Poverty, it has been a half-hearted experiment lacking courageous or consistent national leadership.

Although few people are willing to admit it, desegregation was never truly a national experiment. Most of the efforts to tear down the walls of segregation were aimed at the South while the rest of the nation, practicing more subtle forms of racism, looked on.

Because of the 1954 and 1955 Brown v. Board of Education decisions, the South shifted from being the most segregated region in the nation to the most desegregated. The Harvard Civil Rights Project, using figures compiled by the Southern Education Reporting Service, has published a chart that captures the dramatic changes.

In 1954, 0.001 percent of Blacks attended majority White schools in the South. In 1960, the figure was only 0.1 percent. In 1964, a decade after the original Brown ruling, the figure stood at 2.3 percent. There was a tremendous spurt from 1968 to 1988 when the percentage of African Americans attending majority-White schools in the South jumped from 23.4 percent to 43.5 percent. After peaking in 1988, things started going downhill.

"One of the most consistent trends of the last decade is a reversal of gains in desegregation for Black students made in the South in the late 1960s and 1970s as a result of judicial and executive enforcement of desegregation orders," says a Harvard report. "In fact, court-ordered desegregation of Black students in Southern states resulted in the South becoming the most integrated region in the country, with 43.5 percent of Black students in majority-White schools in 1988.

"In the 1990s, as the desegregation plans have been dismantled across the South, however, the proportion of Black students in majority White schools has decreased by 13 percentage points. In 2000, Black segregation rates in the South continue to increase steadily as they have for over a decade. Today, only 31 percent of Southern Black students are in majority White schools, a rate lower than any year since 1968."

A study by the Harvard Civil Rights Project titled "Racial Transformation and the Changing Nature of Segregation" observes, "For the first 19 years following Brown, the Supreme Court simply ignored segregation outside the 17 Southern and Border states and Washington, D.C., those with a history of state-imposed segregation."

"Since 1980, the Northeast remains the region with the highest share of Blacks attending predominantly minority schools, with almost four out of every five Blacks in these schools," the Harvard report states.

That Time magazine article carried an interesting quote 11 years ago by Harvard sociologist Gary Orfield: "The whole discussion of desegregation is corrupted by the fact that we mix up race and class. You don't gain anything from sitting next to somebody with a different skin color. But you gain a lot from moving from an isolated poverty setting into a middle-class setting."

The latest Supreme Court ruling makes it more difficult to travel that route.


George E. Curry, former editor-in-chief of Emerge magazine and the NNPA News Service, is a keynote speaker, moderator, and media coach.

Recently Published by The Skanner News

  • Default
  • Title
  • Date
  • Random
  • WASHINGTON (AP) — One month after the inauguration, the stretch of Pennsylvania Avenue in front of Donald Trump's White House still is a hard-hat zone. Skeletal remains of the inaugural reviewing stands poke skyward. Random piles of plywood and cables are heaped on the ground inside crooked lines of metal fencing. The disarray outside the president's front door, though not his fault, serves as a metaphor for the tumult still unfolding inside. Four weeks in, the man who says he inherited "a mess" at home and abroad is presiding over a White House that is widely described as itself being a mess. At a stunning pace, Trump has riled world leaders and frustrated allies. He was dealt a bruising legal blow on one of his signature policies. He lost his national security adviser and his pick for labor secretary to scandal. He's seen forces within his government push back against his policies and leak confidential information. All of this has played out amid a steady drip of revelations about an FBI investigation into his campaign's contacts with Russian intelligence officials. Trump says his administration is running like a "fine-tuned machine." He points to the rising stock market and the devotion of his still-loyal supporters as evidence that all is well, although his job approval rating is much lower than that for prior presidents in their first weeks in office. Stung by the unrelenting criticism coming his way, Trump dismisses much of it as "fake news" delivered by "the enemy of the people" — aka the press. Daily denunciations of the media are just one of the new White House fixtures Americans are adjusting to. Most days start (and end) with presidential tweets riffing off of whatever's on TV talk shows or teasing coming events or hurling insults at the media. At some point in the day, count on Trump to cast back to the marvels of his upset of Democrat Hillary Clinton in the November election and quite possibly overstate his margins of support. Expect more denunciations of the "dishonest" press and its "fake news." From there, things can veer in unexpected directions as Trump offers up policy pronouncements or offhand remarks that leave even White House aides struggling to interpret them. The long-standing U.S. policy of seeking a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Trump this past week offered this cryptic pronouncement: "I'm looking at two-state and one-state, and I like the one that both parties like. I can live with either one." His U.N. ambassador, Nikki Haley, the next day insisted, "We absolutely support a two-state solution." Trump's days are busy. Outside groups troop in for "listening sessions." Foreign leaders call or come to visit. (Or, in the case of Mexico's president, cancel out in pique over Trump's talk about the planned border wall.) After the president signed two dozen executive actions, the White House was awaiting a rush order of more of the gold-plated Cross pens that Trump prefers to the chrome-plated ones used by his predecessor. Trump hands them out as souvenirs at the signing ceremonies that he points to as evidence of his ambitious pace. "This last month has represented an unprecedented degree of action on behalf of the great citizens of our country," Trump said at a Thursday news conference. "Again, I say it. There has never been a presidency that's done so much in such a short period of time." That's all music to the ears of his followers, who sent him to Washington to upend the established order and play the role of disrupter. "I can't believe there's actually a politician doing what he says he would do," says an approving Scott Hiltgen, a 66-year-old office furniture sales broker from River Falls, Wisconsin. "That never happens." Disrupt Trump has. But there may be more sound and fury than substance to many of his early actions. Trump did select Judge Neil Gorsuch to replace the late Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court, a nomination that has drawn strong reviews from conservatives. But the president is regrouping on immigration after federal judges blocked his order to suspend the United States' refugee program and ban visitors from seven Muslim-majority countries, which had caused chaos for travelers around the globe. Some other orders on issues such as the U.S.-Mexico border wall and former President Barack Obama's health care law are of limited effect. Trump says his early actions show he means to deliver on the promises he made during the campaign. "A lot of people say, 'Oh, oh, Trump was only kidding with the wall,'" the president told a group of police chiefs recently. "I wasn't kidding. I don't kid." But the Republican-led Congress is still waiting to see specifics on how Trump wants to proceed legislatively on top initiatives such as replacing the health care law, enacting tax cuts and revising trade deals. The messy rollout of the travel ban and tumult over the ouster of national security adviser Michael Flynn for misrepresenting his contacts with Russia are part of a broader state of disarray as different figures in Trump's White House jockey for power and leaks reveal internal discord in the machinations of the presidency. "I thought by now you'd at least hear the outlines of domestic legislation like tax cuts," says Princeton historian Julian Zelizer. "But a lot of that has slowed. Trump shouldn't mistake the fact that some of his supporters like his style with the fact that a lot of Republicans just want the policies he promised them. He has to deliver that." Put Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., in the camp of those more interested in substance than style. "I'm not a great fan of daily tweets," McConnell said Friday, referring to the "extra discussion" that Trump likes to engage in. But McConnell was quick to add: "What I am a fan of is what he's been actually doing." He credits Trump with assembling a conservative Cabinet and taking steps to reduce government regulation, and promised: "We like his positions and we're going to pursue them as vigorously as we can." The challenge may be to tease out exactly what Trump wants in the way of a health care plan, tax changes and trade policy. At his long and defiant news conference on Thursday, Trump tried to dispel the impression of a White House in crisis, squarely blaming the press for keeping him from moving forward more decisively on his agenda. Pointing to his chief of staff, Reince Priebus, Trump said, "You take a look at Reince, he's working so hard just putting out fires that are fake fires. I mean, they're fake. They're not true. And isn't that a shame because he'd rather be working on health care, he'd rather be working on tax reform." For all the frustrations of his early days as president, Trump still seems tickled by the trappings of his office. When New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie visited the White House last week to discuss the national opioid epidemic over lunch, the governor said Trump informed him: "Chris, you and I are going to have the meatloaf.'" Trump added: "I'm telling you, the meatloaf is fabulous." ___Follow Nancy Benac on Twitter at http://twitter.com/nbenac
    Read More
  • FDR executive order sent 120,000 Japanese immigrants and citizens into camps
    Read More
  • Pruitt's nomination was strongly opposed by environmental groups and hundreds of former EPA employees
    Read More
load morehold SHIFT key to load allload all
Carpentry Professionals


Reed College Jobs
His Eye is on the Sparrow