02-19-2017  10:49 am      •     

New Regulations Threaten Low-Income Homeowners



In 1997, a young African American preacher asked for the local office of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for approval to help 160 families purchase duplex homes in a struggling south Sacramento, Calif. neighborhood by giving them down payment assistance grants in order to obtain a mortgage insured by the Federal Housing Administration.

Unknown to him, or the families that bought these homes, the program that he conceived, the Nehemiah Program, helped launch the homeownership revolution of the late 1990s that saw African American and minority homeownership rise to unprecedented levels in the United States.

According to a 2004 study by the Milken Institute and the U.S. Conference of Mayors, the average low-income family making $35,000 that purchased a home between 1997 and 2003 experienced a net wealth gain of $18,000 because of being a homeowner. These families could not have purchased a home without the down payment assistance that the Nehemiah Program provided.

The name — Nehemiah — is important. The namesake that was chosen for the program was intentional. Born out of Antioch Progressive Baptist Church, the Nehemiah Program was named for the prophet well known throughout the Christian faith as the historic re-builder of cities. Like the Nehemiah of the Old Testament, this new Nehemiah was conceived to rebuild the American community one family and one neighborhood at a time.

The nonprofit group that housed this paradigm-changing program, Nehemiah Corporation of America, grew into one of the largest African American-led community development corporations in the United States with almost $200 million in revenue at its peak in 2004. The Nehemiah Program and its imitators that followed grew to over 40 percent of the Federal Housing Administration's annual mortgage production.

As of June 2007, National Homeownership Month, the Nehemiah Program will have helped more than 229,000 families purchase their first homes across every state in the country and has given out almost $900 million in grants without receiving a single dime from either government or foundations. Nehemiah created a model where its down payment assistance comes from revolving funds constantly replenished by contributions from the realtors, lenders and private home sellers across the country.

Today, however, Nehemiah's future is under assault. Like other Black institutions such as the NAACP, the federal government is attempting, by regulation, to end the down payment assistance model Nehemiah created by issuing a proposed regulation that would bar nonprofits or governments from offering down payment assistance where a seller makes a contribution to a fund that offers grants to working class homebuyers.

While some imitators of Nehemiah have engaged in practices that deserve increased regulation and oversight -- which Nehemiah supports and advocates -- the federal government is pushing an agenda which instead "mends it don't end it" seeks to absolutely ban a model that has helped so many.

Unlike the sub-prime loans that are currently under scrutiny because of terms and practices that take advantage of low-income homebuyers, 98 percent of Nehemiah grant families receive their loans combined with FHA insurance ensuring that the loans meet the Federal Government's requirements for fairness.

Indeed, some in the mortgage industry believe that the success of the Nehemiah Program led the mortgage industry to change its historic discriminatory practices and for better and worse start to view minority communities as viable markets for their products including sub-prime.

Cynically, this proposal is pushed by the HUD inspector general who has railed against Nehemiah and the low income families it serves since its beginning in 1997.

First, they claimed that giving down payments to those without savings of their own was helping those "unworthy" of homeownership. Later, they claimed that Nehemiah's default performance was higher than average.

After Nehemiah refuted their claims, they then forced FHA to issue this proposed regulation under the guise of trying to "protect the financial solvency of FHA" by killing this model knowing that if FHA loses the 40 percent of its current business, it might permanently cripple this program. In others words, the FHA's position is "In order to save you FHA, we must destroy you."

This is certainly a sad fate for an agency that has been the primary means for low-income and minority families to enter homeownership for over half a century.

Some believe that -- like the assault on the NAACP -- these cynical actions are not random, but a coordinated effort by those who care little for the aspirations of the underserved. They feel no guilt over the unpaid debt of the 40 acres and a mule that African Americans never received as uncompensated builders of this nation. Nehemiah today serves the descendants of these people, as well as the recent immigrant, and the families of single moms trying to make a better life for their children.

We can still save the Nehemiah model, which has helped more than 500,000 families nationally to finally stop living like 21st century sharecroppers. The public comment period for this regulation ends July 10, 2007. To find out more, go to www.getdownpayment.com or call your Congressional representative and United States Senator and tell them to contact HUD in opposition to the proposed regulation.

The Nehemiah Corporation believes that if you are a renter today, tomorrow you can be a homeowner. That is the promise of the American dream. Let us together recommit to preserving that dream for our children and the generations yet unborn. The future is ours to shape.


Scott C. Syphax is the president and CEO of Nehemiah Corporation of America.

Recently Published by The Skanner News

  • Default
  • Title
  • Date
  • Random
  • WASHINGTON (AP) — One month after the inauguration, the stretch of Pennsylvania Avenue in front of Donald Trump's White House still is a hard-hat zone. Skeletal remains of the inaugural reviewing stands poke skyward. Random piles of plywood and cables are heaped on the ground inside crooked lines of metal fencing. The disarray outside the president's front door, though not his fault, serves as a metaphor for the tumult still unfolding inside. Four weeks in, the man who says he inherited "a mess" at home and abroad is presiding over a White House that is widely described as itself being a mess. At a stunning pace, Trump has riled world leaders and frustrated allies. He was dealt a bruising legal blow on one of his signature policies. He lost his national security adviser and his pick for labor secretary to scandal. He's seen forces within his government push back against his policies and leak confidential information. All of this has played out amid a steady drip of revelations about an FBI investigation into his campaign's contacts with Russian intelligence officials. Trump says his administration is running like a "fine-tuned machine." He points to the rising stock market and the devotion of his still-loyal supporters as evidence that all is well, although his job approval rating is much lower than that for prior presidents in their first weeks in office. Stung by the unrelenting criticism coming his way, Trump dismisses much of it as "fake news" delivered by "the enemy of the people" — aka the press. Daily denunciations of the media are just one of the new White House fixtures Americans are adjusting to. Most days start (and end) with presidential tweets riffing off of whatever's on TV talk shows or teasing coming events or hurling insults at the media. At some point in the day, count on Trump to cast back to the marvels of his upset of Democrat Hillary Clinton in the November election and quite possibly overstate his margins of support. Expect more denunciations of the "dishonest" press and its "fake news." From there, things can veer in unexpected directions as Trump offers up policy pronouncements or offhand remarks that leave even White House aides struggling to interpret them. The long-standing U.S. policy of seeking a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Trump this past week offered this cryptic pronouncement: "I'm looking at two-state and one-state, and I like the one that both parties like. I can live with either one." His U.N. ambassador, Nikki Haley, the next day insisted, "We absolutely support a two-state solution." Trump's days are busy. Outside groups troop in for "listening sessions." Foreign leaders call or come to visit. (Or, in the case of Mexico's president, cancel out in pique over Trump's talk about the planned border wall.) After the president signed two dozen executive actions, the White House was awaiting a rush order of more of the gold-plated Cross pens that Trump prefers to the chrome-plated ones used by his predecessor. Trump hands them out as souvenirs at the signing ceremonies that he points to as evidence of his ambitious pace. "This last month has represented an unprecedented degree of action on behalf of the great citizens of our country," Trump said at a Thursday news conference. "Again, I say it. There has never been a presidency that's done so much in such a short period of time." That's all music to the ears of his followers, who sent him to Washington to upend the established order and play the role of disrupter. "I can't believe there's actually a politician doing what he says he would do," says an approving Scott Hiltgen, a 66-year-old office furniture sales broker from River Falls, Wisconsin. "That never happens." Disrupt Trump has. But there may be more sound and fury than substance to many of his early actions. Trump did select Judge Neil Gorsuch to replace the late Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court, a nomination that has drawn strong reviews from conservatives. But the president is regrouping on immigration after federal judges blocked his order to suspend the United States' refugee program and ban visitors from seven Muslim-majority countries, which had caused chaos for travelers around the globe. Some other orders on issues such as the U.S.-Mexico border wall and former President Barack Obama's health care law are of limited effect. Trump says his early actions show he means to deliver on the promises he made during the campaign. "A lot of people say, 'Oh, oh, Trump was only kidding with the wall,'" the president told a group of police chiefs recently. "I wasn't kidding. I don't kid." But the Republican-led Congress is still waiting to see specifics on how Trump wants to proceed legislatively on top initiatives such as replacing the health care law, enacting tax cuts and revising trade deals. The messy rollout of the travel ban and tumult over the ouster of national security adviser Michael Flynn for misrepresenting his contacts with Russia are part of a broader state of disarray as different figures in Trump's White House jockey for power and leaks reveal internal discord in the machinations of the presidency. "I thought by now you'd at least hear the outlines of domestic legislation like tax cuts," says Princeton historian Julian Zelizer. "But a lot of that has slowed. Trump shouldn't mistake the fact that some of his supporters like his style with the fact that a lot of Republicans just want the policies he promised them. He has to deliver that." Put Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., in the camp of those more interested in substance than style. "I'm not a great fan of daily tweets," McConnell said Friday, referring to the "extra discussion" that Trump likes to engage in. But McConnell was quick to add: "What I am a fan of is what he's been actually doing." He credits Trump with assembling a conservative Cabinet and taking steps to reduce government regulation, and promised: "We like his positions and we're going to pursue them as vigorously as we can." The challenge may be to tease out exactly what Trump wants in the way of a health care plan, tax changes and trade policy. At his long and defiant news conference on Thursday, Trump tried to dispel the impression of a White House in crisis, squarely blaming the press for keeping him from moving forward more decisively on his agenda. Pointing to his chief of staff, Reince Priebus, Trump said, "You take a look at Reince, he's working so hard just putting out fires that are fake fires. I mean, they're fake. They're not true. And isn't that a shame because he'd rather be working on health care, he'd rather be working on tax reform." For all the frustrations of his early days as president, Trump still seems tickled by the trappings of his office. When New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie visited the White House last week to discuss the national opioid epidemic over lunch, the governor said Trump informed him: "Chris, you and I are going to have the meatloaf.'" Trump added: "I'm telling you, the meatloaf is fabulous." ___Follow Nancy Benac on Twitter at http://twitter.com/nbenac
    Read More
  • FDR executive order sent 120,000 Japanese immigrants and citizens into camps
    Read More
  • Pruitt's nomination was strongly opposed by environmental groups and hundreds of former EPA employees
    Read More
load morehold SHIFT key to load allload all