04 21 2015
  7:38 am  
     •     
40 Years of Service
agricultural-machinery

An open letter from Rep. Earl Blumenauer to Oregonian voters:

The Farm Bill that passed Congress this week was a missed opportunity for true reform. It dramatically shortchanged nutrition and conservation. These are the programs that Oregon’s families, farmers, and ranchers count on the most. I have called on the President to veto this unfortunate bill. While the reality is that the bill may not get better if Congress continues to struggle with it and leave us dependent on the appropriations process for money for the programs no longer authorized, it is not worthy of support.

The egregious direct payments, which provided cash payments regardless of whether people even farmed at all, were replaced by new provisions that may end up costing the taxpayer more in the long run. There is still an $8 billion cut to SNAP, which translates into almost 80,000 of Oregon’s most vulnerable families losing $58/month for food assistance, according to the Oregon Department of Health and Human Services.

$6 billion was cut from conservation programs at a time when there is more strain on soil and water. Farmers rely on these programs to be better stewards of their water and land. My Balancing Food, Farm and the Environment Act would have directed more funding towards helping farmers manage farmland and habitat, not subsidizing large agribusiness to manage animal waste from their Contained Animal Feeding Operations. This is just one example of how we should be investing more wisely, and in the long run, saving farmers and taxpayers money.

There were some bright spots. The King Amendment, which would have overturned critical state protections for consumers, the environment and animal welfare, was finally stripped away. My amendment to ease restrictions on industrial hemp cultivation was also included. Welcome investments were made in organics and “specialty crops” (which most call “food” – our fruits and vegetables that are so important to Oregon agriculture).

Overall the bill misses the mark and does not meet the expectations of the Oregonians who are involved with agriculture, nutrition and the environment and who have written in, spoken up, and met with me. If you care about a Farm Bill that is better for the nation and for Oregon, I invite your thoughts and feedback as we begin preparing for the next opportunity to reform our nation’s agricultural policies.

Sincerely,

Earl Blumenauer

Member of Congress

Pacific NW Carpenters Union

Commenting Guidelines

  • Keep it clean: Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language
  • No personal attacks: We reserve the right to remove offensive comments
  • Be truthful: Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything
  • Be nice: No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person
  • Help us: If you see an abusive post, let us know at info@theskanner.com
  • Keep to topic: We will remove irrelevant posts and spam
  • Share with us: We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts; the history behind an article

Recently Published by The Skanner News

  • Default
  • Title
  • Date
  • Random
  • When should we use military to enforce US goals? NASHUA, N.H. (AP) — Rand Paul lashed out Saturday at military hawks in the Republican Party in a clash over foreign policy dividing the packed GOP presidential field. Paul, a first-term senator from Kentucky who favors a smaller U.S. footprint in the world, said that some of his Republican colleagues would do more harm in international affairs than would leading Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton. "The other Republicans will criticize the president and Hillary Clinton for their foreign policy, but they would just have done the same thing — just 10 times over," Paul said on the closing day of a New Hampshire GOP conference that brought about 20 presidential prospects to the first-in-the-nation primary state. "There's a group of folks in our party who would have troops in six countries right now, maybe more," Paul said. Foreign policy looms large in the presidential race as the U.S. struggles to resolve diplomatic and military conflicts across the globe. The GOP presidential class regularly rails against President Barack Obama's leadership on the world stage, yet some would-be contenders have yet to articulate their own positions, while others offered sharply different visions. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, whose brother, President George W. Bush, authorized the 2003 invasion of Iraq, declined to say whether he would have done anything different then. Yet Jeb Bush acknowledged a shift in his party against new military action abroad. "Our enemies need to fear us, a little bit, just enough for them to deter the actions that create insecurity," Bush said earlier in the conference. He said restoring alliances "that will create less likelihood of America's boots on the ground has to be the priority, the first priority of the next president." The GOP's hawks were well represented at the event, led by Florida Sen. Marco Rubio and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who has limited foreign policy experience but articulated a muscular vision during his Saturday keynote address. Walker said the threats posed by radical Islamic terrorism won't be handled simply with "a couple bombings." "We're not going to wait till they bring the fight to us," Walker said. "We're going to bring the fight to them and fight on their soil." South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham addressed the question of putting U.S. troops directly in the battle against the Islamic State group militants by saying there is only one way to defeat the militants: "You go over there and you fight them so they don't come here." Texas Sen. Ted Cruz suggested an aggressive approach as well. "The way to defeat ISIS is a simple and clear military objective," he said. "We will destroy them." Businesswoman Carly Fiorina offered a similar outlook. "The world is a more dangerous and more tragic place when America is not leading. And America has not led for quite some time," she said. Under Obama, a U.S.-led coalition of Western and Arab countries is conducting regular airstrikes against Islamic State targets in Iraq and Syria. The U.S. also has hundreds of military advisers in Iraq helping Iraqi security forces plan operations against the Islamic State, which occupies large chunks of northern and western Iraq. Paul didn't totally reject the use of military force, noting that he recently introduced a declaration of war against the Islamic State group. But in an interview with The Associated Press, he emphasized the importance of diplomacy. He singled out Russia and China, which have complicated relationships with the U.S., as countries that could contribute to U.S. foreign policy interests. "I think the Russians and the Chinese have great potential to help make the world a better place," he said. "I don't say that naively that they're going to, but they have the potential to." Paul suggested the Russians could help by getting Syrian President Bashar Assad to leave power. "Maybe he goes to Russia," Paul said. Despite tensions with the U.S., Russia and China negotiated alongside Washington in nuclear talks with Iran. Paul has said he is keeping an open mind about the nuclear negotiations. "The people who already are very skeptical, very doubtful, may not like the president for partisan reasons," he said, and "just may want war instead of negotiations."
    Read More
  • Some lawmakers, sensing a tipping point, are backing the parents and teachers who complain about 'high stakes' tests   
    Read More
  • Watch Rachel Maddow interview VA Secretary Robert McDonald  
    Read More
  • Some two thousand people pack halls to hear Trayvon Martin's mom speak   
    Read More
load morehold SHIFT key to load allload all
Carpentry Professionals

PHOTO GALLERY

Calendar

About Us

Breaking News

The Skanner TV

Turn the pages

Hood to Coast
The Skanner Photo Archives