02-19-2017  3:24 pm      •     

Calls for changes in the way Portland police do their job are coming to a boil over the next week, as members of the public will have two major events to make their voices heard on the issue of police accountability.
A public forum on the 2006 beating death by police of James Chasse Jr., and the wider issues of law enforcement in the community, is this Sunday at Portland State University, hosted by the Citizens Review Committee of the Independent Police Review Division of the city auditor's office.
Then Thursday, March 18 at 2 p.m. Commissioner Randy Leonard has scheduled a hearing on his and City Auditor Yvonne Griffin-Valade's proposal to tighten civilian oversight of the police bureau at the City Council.
Meanwhile the Albina Ministerial Alliance's justice committee has issued a list of demands to city leaders for basic law enforcement reforms, which they are using as a yardstick to measure the new city proposal.

The city officials call their plan a "comprehensive overhaul" that gives the IPR director the power to investigate police misconduct and subpoena witnesses, as well as review police investigations, force reviews of misconduct cases, and recommend disciplinary action to the police chief and bureau commanders.

The proposal would create an official Police Review Board which makes its decisions public.
"These changes lay the groundwork for the IPR to become one of the most effective police oversight systems in the country," Leonard said today on releasing the proposed new policies. "We are about to enter a long-awaited era of police accountability in Portland."

Reform Proposal 'Not Enough'

Police accountability watchdog Dan Handleman of Portland Copwatch calls the Leonard/Griffin-Valade proposal "something but not enough."
First of all, Handleman says the rewrite does nothing to change the most fundamental flaw in the entire police review process: the "underlying structure of police investigating police."
"The entire structure of the IPR is such that – and I know this from experience because we run an incident report line here—that it's called the Independent Police Review Division, a person calls them up and they say, 'No we're not with the police, don't worry, just tell us what your complaint is,' and then if the IPR decides it warrants an investigation, they turn it over to the police," Handleman said.
"When you tell a person who feels they've been mistreated that, you can hear this audible gasp on the other side of the phone," he said.
"It's like, 'The police are going to investigate the police doing something to me, why would I even do that?'"
Handleman is critical of the idea of giving the IPR director the power to decide which cases to investigate – rather than allowing the citizens on the review committee to do it.
Also, the activist says, the proposal isn't clear on whether the new review board could investigate shootings and police-caused deaths in custody, and apparently doesn't take into account a new effort by CRC members to come up with reforms, an outline for which is upcoming after the Chasse forum.
The bottom line, Handleman argues, is that this new proposal is too slap-dash and hasn't been well thought-through.
"The 'Police Review Board' part similarly has some improvements (particularly that IPR can vote and the board has to publish its findings) but needs more work as well," Handleman wrote in an email to The Skanner News.
Portland Copwatch has on its website a list of the top payouts made by the City of Portland due to police misconduct – however it does not include settlements in the James Chasse Jr. case, which so far include nearly $1 million paid out last year by Multnomah County.

CRC Forum Sunday

The Citizens Review Committee's James Chasse forum is Sunday, March 14, from 2 to 4 p.m. at Hoffman Hall on the campus of Portland State University, 1833 SW 11th Ave.
The forum is also open to comment about other recent cases such as the recent police shooting of Aaron Campbell, and any other personal experiences and concerns the public may have about community accountability for law enforcement.
Four years ago Chasse, 42, died in police custody after allegedly urinating in a Pearl District street. The county medical examiner determined the cause of death to be blunt force trauma to the chest, including 16 broken ribs and a punctured lung.
Multnomah County Sheriff's Deputy Bret Burton, as well as Officer Christopher Humphreys and Sgt. Kyle Nice of the Portland Police, chased and wrestled Chasse facedown on the pavement and cuffed his hands behind his back.
Witnesses testified that Chasse, who suffered from schizophrenia, was kicked in the head and chest by the arresting officers after being cuffed.
Multnomah County paid out a record-setting $925,000 to Chasse's family, with AMR reportedly settling for $600,000.
Chasse's family brought a wrongful death lawsuit against the City of Portland, which for the past three years has refused to a settle. Oral arguments were scheduled to begin in the case in mid-February, but now city officials are reportedly negotiating a payout.
The CRC staff says it will use the public input at the Chasse forum to "identify policy issues raised by the community and make recommendations for policy changes to the Auditor's Independent Police Review division and to the Portland Police Bureau itself."
A subcommittee of the nine-member volunteer citizens' panel has already met for months to discuss their own proposals for accountability reform.
The event is co-sponsored by the nonprofit mediation organization Resolutions Northwest, and the Portland State University Student Veterans Association.
For more information, or to leave your own comments on the issue, call the CRC at 503-823-0926 or e-mail your testimony to crc@ci.portland.or.us .
The Mental Health Association of Portland is also actively engaged on this issue, at http://www.mentalhealthportland.org .

AMA Reform Effort

Meanwhile the Albina Ministerial Alliance Coalition for Justice and Police Reform last week unveiled "five necessary changes to prevent the future death of another Aaron Campbell, James Chasse, James Jahar Perez, Jose Mejia Poot, Kendra James and others."
The coalition wants:
1. A federal investigation by the U.S. Justice Department to include: Criminal and civil rights violations, as well as a federal audit of patterns and practices of the Portland Police Bureau.
2. Portland City Commissioners to strengthen the Independent Police Review Division and the Citizen Review Committee with the goal of adding the power to compel testimony.
3. Portland Police Bureau Chief Rosie Sizer and the Portland City Commissioners to fully review the bureau's excessive force and deadly force policies and training with diverse citizen participation for the purpose of making recommendations to change the policies and training.
4. The Oregon State Legislature to revisit former Senator Avel Gordly's bill to narrow the language of the Oregon State Statute for deadly force used by police officers.
5. The district attorney to establish a special prosecutor for police excessive force and deadly force cases.
The group noted today that the Leonard/Griffin-Valade proposal only includes one of their demands: subpoena power for the IPR.
The AMA's new coalition for police reform has launched a lively and frequently-updated Facebook fan page linked to their website, http://www.albinaministerialalliance.org

Recently Published by The Skanner News

  • Default
  • Title
  • Date
  • Random
  • WASHINGTON (AP) — One month after the inauguration, the stretch of Pennsylvania Avenue in front of Donald Trump's White House still is a hard-hat zone. Skeletal remains of the inaugural reviewing stands poke skyward. Random piles of plywood and cables are heaped on the ground inside crooked lines of metal fencing. The disarray outside the president's front door, though not his fault, serves as a metaphor for the tumult still unfolding inside. Four weeks in, the man who says he inherited "a mess" at home and abroad is presiding over a White House that is widely described as itself being a mess. At a stunning pace, Trump has riled world leaders and frustrated allies. He was dealt a bruising legal blow on one of his signature policies. He lost his national security adviser and his pick for labor secretary to scandal. He's seen forces within his government push back against his policies and leak confidential information. All of this has played out amid a steady drip of revelations about an FBI investigation into his campaign's contacts with Russian intelligence officials. Trump says his administration is running like a "fine-tuned machine." He points to the rising stock market and the devotion of his still-loyal supporters as evidence that all is well, although his job approval rating is much lower than that for prior presidents in their first weeks in office. Stung by the unrelenting criticism coming his way, Trump dismisses much of it as "fake news" delivered by "the enemy of the people" — aka the press. Daily denunciations of the media are just one of the new White House fixtures Americans are adjusting to. Most days start (and end) with presidential tweets riffing off of whatever's on TV talk shows or teasing coming events or hurling insults at the media. At some point in the day, count on Trump to cast back to the marvels of his upset of Democrat Hillary Clinton in the November election and quite possibly overstate his margins of support. Expect more denunciations of the "dishonest" press and its "fake news." From there, things can veer in unexpected directions as Trump offers up policy pronouncements or offhand remarks that leave even White House aides struggling to interpret them. The long-standing U.S. policy of seeking a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Trump this past week offered this cryptic pronouncement: "I'm looking at two-state and one-state, and I like the one that both parties like. I can live with either one." His U.N. ambassador, Nikki Haley, the next day insisted, "We absolutely support a two-state solution." Trump's days are busy. Outside groups troop in for "listening sessions." Foreign leaders call or come to visit. (Or, in the case of Mexico's president, cancel out in pique over Trump's talk about the planned border wall.) After the president signed two dozen executive actions, the White House was awaiting a rush order of more of the gold-plated Cross pens that Trump prefers to the chrome-plated ones used by his predecessor. Trump hands them out as souvenirs at the signing ceremonies that he points to as evidence of his ambitious pace. "This last month has represented an unprecedented degree of action on behalf of the great citizens of our country," Trump said at a Thursday news conference. "Again, I say it. There has never been a presidency that's done so much in such a short period of time." That's all music to the ears of his followers, who sent him to Washington to upend the established order and play the role of disrupter. "I can't believe there's actually a politician doing what he says he would do," says an approving Scott Hiltgen, a 66-year-old office furniture sales broker from River Falls, Wisconsin. "That never happens." Disrupt Trump has. But there may be more sound and fury than substance to many of his early actions. Trump did select Judge Neil Gorsuch to replace the late Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court, a nomination that has drawn strong reviews from conservatives. But the president is regrouping on immigration after federal judges blocked his order to suspend the United States' refugee program and ban visitors from seven Muslim-majority countries, which had caused chaos for travelers around the globe. Some other orders on issues such as the U.S.-Mexico border wall and former President Barack Obama's health care law are of limited effect. Trump says his early actions show he means to deliver on the promises he made during the campaign. "A lot of people say, 'Oh, oh, Trump was only kidding with the wall,'" the president told a group of police chiefs recently. "I wasn't kidding. I don't kid." But the Republican-led Congress is still waiting to see specifics on how Trump wants to proceed legislatively on top initiatives such as replacing the health care law, enacting tax cuts and revising trade deals. The messy rollout of the travel ban and tumult over the ouster of national security adviser Michael Flynn for misrepresenting his contacts with Russia are part of a broader state of disarray as different figures in Trump's White House jockey for power and leaks reveal internal discord in the machinations of the presidency. "I thought by now you'd at least hear the outlines of domestic legislation like tax cuts," says Princeton historian Julian Zelizer. "But a lot of that has slowed. Trump shouldn't mistake the fact that some of his supporters like his style with the fact that a lot of Republicans just want the policies he promised them. He has to deliver that." Put Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., in the camp of those more interested in substance than style. "I'm not a great fan of daily tweets," McConnell said Friday, referring to the "extra discussion" that Trump likes to engage in. But McConnell was quick to add: "What I am a fan of is what he's been actually doing." He credits Trump with assembling a conservative Cabinet and taking steps to reduce government regulation, and promised: "We like his positions and we're going to pursue them as vigorously as we can." The challenge may be to tease out exactly what Trump wants in the way of a health care plan, tax changes and trade policy. At his long and defiant news conference on Thursday, Trump tried to dispel the impression of a White House in crisis, squarely blaming the press for keeping him from moving forward more decisively on his agenda. Pointing to his chief of staff, Reince Priebus, Trump said, "You take a look at Reince, he's working so hard just putting out fires that are fake fires. I mean, they're fake. They're not true. And isn't that a shame because he'd rather be working on health care, he'd rather be working on tax reform." For all the frustrations of his early days as president, Trump still seems tickled by the trappings of his office. When New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie visited the White House last week to discuss the national opioid epidemic over lunch, the governor said Trump informed him: "Chris, you and I are going to have the meatloaf.'" Trump added: "I'm telling you, the meatloaf is fabulous." ___Follow Nancy Benac on Twitter at http://twitter.com/nbenac
    Read More
  • FDR executive order sent 120,000 Japanese immigrants and citizens into camps
    Read More
  • Pruitt's nomination was strongly opposed by environmental groups and hundreds of former EPA employees
    Read More
load morehold SHIFT key to load allload all
Oregon Lottery
Carpentry Professionals


Reed College Jobs
His Eye is on the Sparrow