04 21 2015
  2:47 am  
40 Years of Service
Don Merrill

There are millions of websites out there with gazillions of political points of view fighting for voters’ attention every day of the week.

But how many of them are actually useful tools for understanding your own political environment -- whether you’re a Democrat, Republican, Green or Libertarian?

Don Merrill of Oregon City just launched a website for everyday people to dig deep into state Constitutions, using e-book-inspired audio uploads, breaking news updates and more – and he hopes that people from coast to coast will use it to become active in making their state the best it can be.

Along the way his work offers fascinating insight into each state’s “personality,” and a deeper understanding of the different roles played by state and federal governments in our daily lives.

Originally from Ohio, Merrill is a retired soldier; a former federal government public affairs specialist; a radio, video and print journalist; and now self-employed media expert with experience across many platforms.

The Skanner News sat down with him to talk about his stunning new website, http://www.stateconstitutions.us, and why state constitutions are key factors shaping our everyday lives.

The Skanner News: What inspired you to build this web resource?

Don Merrill: I wanted people to have more access to their state government. I wanted them to have more access to the founding documents of their state, the Constitutions. I’ve just been really disappointed in the way the federal government has been behaving. Whether we’re talking about court decisions, whether we’re talking about our president who either didn’t follow the good advice he had to got bad advice; to our legislators who can’t seem to legislate, let alone cooperate, let alone communicate.

And so I started thinking, well there must be another way that people can get access to their government. Fortunately we have a Federalist system so there are levels – federal, state and municipal -- and the level that I think affects most people on the day to day level is the state. So I thought everyone puts so much emphasis on the federal constitution, but as I did this project I realized that the federal constitution, when it was created it really was meant to give just the most basic of protections, it’s at the states where the day to day work of governing our lives takes place, but people don’t really pay attention to the state constitution.

And so I thought that if they had more access to it, they would access it more. Because these people – when legislators make a decision they don’t go someplace else when they’re done; they live here. So we have more effect on them, as opposed to the federal legislators who go through a Dr Jekyll and Mr. Hyde thing when they get elected and they go away.

TSN: Where there any surprises for you?

Merrill: I learned that Alabama has the longest constitution on Earth. I turned all of these Constitutions into audio files, so they could be downloaded as an audio book. So people could listen to them. It’s really a long process, I could tell you but it’s really long.

The Alabama constitution is longer than India’s and when I turned it into an audio file it was 44 hours long.

The shortest constitution is Vermont; it’s an hour. The US constitution is shorter than Vermont’s constitution and that was also something that I was thinking about: How is it that a document that governs 300 million people is shorter than the shortest constitution in the states? And it’s because, again, the federal constitution was not designed to govern our day to day lives; the states were.

Another thing I learned was, almost every state’s constitution begins with a promise to its people, and that promise is called a preamble. Almost every state has a preamble; our state has a preamble. Preambles are promises that the founding fathers made to the people who are going to live in that state of what they promise to do on behalf of the state and what they plan to do on behalf of the people who live in that state.

Preambles are very different fro state to state. Some states focus on their relationship to the land; other states focus on their relationship to God. Other preambles focus on their aspirations for industry or commerce. Some states are really particular about their location, in their preamble they’ll say beginning at Missouri River, transversing the border of so and so.

So you can see through the preambles, states have very different characters and personalities. I try to address a lot of things on this website to have people become familiar not just with the constitutions but for people to get familiar with the personalities of the states those constitutions govern.

TSN: You’ve got a lot more going on here than it seems. You have audiofiles of the constitutions as well as written copies; you also have a news feed.

Merrill: I have a news feed about challenges to the constitutions across the country. So if people want to read about how state constitutions can be challenged in court, they can read the news feed and then if you scroll back up to the top of the page, if readers see a term they want to investigate they can type it in and find where that term appears in the state constitution. They can look through all constitutions or they can select the state and see where that term appears in their state constitution.

So, just to take that one example, if someone wanted to investigate issues of race and racial language in the Oregon constitution, they could just come over here and start searching around.

TSN: What do you want people to do with it?
Merrill: I want people to become more aware one, of the effect government has on them, and two, the effect they can have on government. I don’t think people can do that as easily at the federal level as they can at the state level.

TSN: What are you working on next?
Merrill: This has got me thinking about the federal government, and I’m thinking that I might want to at some point start working on a look at the efficiency and efficacy of federal agencies. I look at the way they operate and I’m not sure – for instance the whole public comment process. I worked for a federal agency for 12 years and I was in the military for 12 years, so I have a lot of experience with the federal government. The way the federal government deals with the public is really, really interesting. I’m not sure the agencies operate in the bests interests of the public. And because I have the experience that I have, I think there are some ways I might be able to bring to the table, some kind of book or something.

For more information go to www.stateconstitutions.us

Pacific NW Carpenters Union

Commenting Guidelines

  • Keep it clean: Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language
  • No personal attacks: We reserve the right to remove offensive comments
  • Be truthful: Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything
  • Be nice: No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person
  • Help us: If you see an abusive post, let us know at info@theskanner.com
  • Keep to topic: We will remove irrelevant posts and spam
  • Share with us: We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts; the history behind an article

Recently Published by The Skanner News

  • Default
  • Title
  • Date
  • Random
  • When should we use military to enforce US goals? NASHUA, N.H. (AP) — Rand Paul lashed out Saturday at military hawks in the Republican Party in a clash over foreign policy dividing the packed GOP presidential field. Paul, a first-term senator from Kentucky who favors a smaller U.S. footprint in the world, said that some of his Republican colleagues would do more harm in international affairs than would leading Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton. "The other Republicans will criticize the president and Hillary Clinton for their foreign policy, but they would just have done the same thing — just 10 times over," Paul said on the closing day of a New Hampshire GOP conference that brought about 20 presidential prospects to the first-in-the-nation primary state. "There's a group of folks in our party who would have troops in six countries right now, maybe more," Paul said. Foreign policy looms large in the presidential race as the U.S. struggles to resolve diplomatic and military conflicts across the globe. The GOP presidential class regularly rails against President Barack Obama's leadership on the world stage, yet some would-be contenders have yet to articulate their own positions, while others offered sharply different visions. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, whose brother, President George W. Bush, authorized the 2003 invasion of Iraq, declined to say whether he would have done anything different then. Yet Jeb Bush acknowledged a shift in his party against new military action abroad. "Our enemies need to fear us, a little bit, just enough for them to deter the actions that create insecurity," Bush said earlier in the conference. He said restoring alliances "that will create less likelihood of America's boots on the ground has to be the priority, the first priority of the next president." The GOP's hawks were well represented at the event, led by Florida Sen. Marco Rubio and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who has limited foreign policy experience but articulated a muscular vision during his Saturday keynote address. Walker said the threats posed by radical Islamic terrorism won't be handled simply with "a couple bombings." "We're not going to wait till they bring the fight to us," Walker said. "We're going to bring the fight to them and fight on their soil." South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham addressed the question of putting U.S. troops directly in the battle against the Islamic State group militants by saying there is only one way to defeat the militants: "You go over there and you fight them so they don't come here." Texas Sen. Ted Cruz suggested an aggressive approach as well. "The way to defeat ISIS is a simple and clear military objective," he said. "We will destroy them." Businesswoman Carly Fiorina offered a similar outlook. "The world is a more dangerous and more tragic place when America is not leading. And America has not led for quite some time," she said. Under Obama, a U.S.-led coalition of Western and Arab countries is conducting regular airstrikes against Islamic State targets in Iraq and Syria. The U.S. also has hundreds of military advisers in Iraq helping Iraqi security forces plan operations against the Islamic State, which occupies large chunks of northern and western Iraq. Paul didn't totally reject the use of military force, noting that he recently introduced a declaration of war against the Islamic State group. But in an interview with The Associated Press, he emphasized the importance of diplomacy. He singled out Russia and China, which have complicated relationships with the U.S., as countries that could contribute to U.S. foreign policy interests. "I think the Russians and the Chinese have great potential to help make the world a better place," he said. "I don't say that naively that they're going to, but they have the potential to." Paul suggested the Russians could help by getting Syrian President Bashar Assad to leave power. "Maybe he goes to Russia," Paul said. Despite tensions with the U.S., Russia and China negotiated alongside Washington in nuclear talks with Iran. Paul has said he is keeping an open mind about the nuclear negotiations. "The people who already are very skeptical, very doubtful, may not like the president for partisan reasons," he said, and "just may want war instead of negotiations."
    Read More
  • Some lawmakers, sensing a tipping point, are backing the parents and teachers who complain about 'high stakes' tests   
    Read More
  • Watch Rachel Maddow interview VA Secretary Robert McDonald  
    Read More
  • Some two thousand people pack halls to hear Trayvon Martin's mom speak   
    Read More
load morehold SHIFT key to load allload all


The Skanner Photo Archives

About Us

Breaking News

The Skanner TV

Turn the pages

Portland Opera Showboat 2
The Skanner Photo Archives