02-19-2017  3:27 pm      •     

Portland Police Chief Mike Reese has released draft policy changes on police use of force. But advocates say the proposals fall far short of resolving problems identified last month in a federal Department of Justice report.


 Last month the Department of Justice released a report with findings that Portland Police Bureau had a "pattern or practice" of using excessive force against people with mental illness. Now, Portland Police Chief Mike Reese has unveiled draft policy changes on police use of force. The policies are posted on the bureau's website along with a space for comments. But advocates say they fall far short of resolving problems identified last month in a federal Department of Justice report.

 The DOJ report on Portland Police Bureau found a pattern and practice of excessive force against people with mental illness. That report also raised concerns about the tense relationship between police and Portland's communities of color.

Jo Ann Hardesty, of the Albina Ministerial Alliance, says policy changes should not be decided before the City of Portland and the Department of Justice sign a Letter of Agreement. The Letter of Agreement was scheduled for completion on Oct. 12, but has been delayed because the city and federal attorneys have not yet reached an agreement on policy changes.

In Hardesty's view, Reese's move is simply an attempt to avoid making fundamental changes by making minimal tweaks to the policies.

"He's putting the cart before the horse," she said. "The Department of Justice report made a lot of recommendations. It's not just one part of the police bureau that is broken; it's broken throughout. So I think it's a horrible decision to put out these policy changes with no community involvement."

Hardesty said that a key recommendation in the report was that the community should be closely involved with making change in the police bureau. And she said she has written to Portland City Commissioners urging them to avoid changing the policies before the DOJ spells out what needs to be done to remedy the problems.

"I hope city council won't allow this to happen before the community has seen the Letter of Agreement and understands what the DOJ has mandated," she said. "This needs to be a transparent process."

The three draft policies address: taser use; use of force; and deadly force. To comment, you must read through the policies and click on the comment link at the bottom of the page.

Several recommendations in the DOJ report are not included in the policy changes.

The draft taser policy includes new wording that says officers should consider a person's mental health before using the taser, and also consider other strategies if two cycles are ineffective. It also says that tasers should not be deployed against people who are running away from police, unless they present an immediate threat.

DOJ officials had called for a limit on the number of times a taser can be deployed against a person, but that is not in the draft.

The draft use of force policy includes new language that says officers must recognize that people with mental illnesses may need a specialized response. As in previous policies, it states officers should resolve situations using the least amount of force necessary, a standard stricter than federal law. It also says officers should describe their efforts to de-escalate situations, and to justify any use of force.

The deadly force draft policy includes a new, on-scene interview, where officers who kill someone must give investigators an overview of what happened, after they've had time to contact an attorney or union representative. The police contract allows officers 48 hours before they are questioned in a formal interview. Under the draft policy, an internal affairs officer would be present at the interview or view it remotely.

What Reese's proposed deadly force policy does not do is get rid of the 48-hour rule, one of the DOJ recommendations.

Reese already has decided to push forward with a plan to create a specialized crisis intervention team, within the bureau— a key recommendation in the DOJ report. From 1995 to 2007, the bureau deployed a specialized crisis intervention team, but Chief Tom Potter disbanded it after James Chasse died in police custody. Instead, all police officers were required to attend 40 hours of crisis intervention training. Under the chief's new plan that requirement would be retained but a specialized crisis intervention team would be available around the clock. 

Jason Renaud of the Mental Health Association of Portland said the problem in the past was that crisis team officers were rarely available when most needed. And he said a small team of specialized officers won't be able to handle every situation dealing with a mentally ill person, because police deal with mentally ill and addicted people every day, all day.

Renaud says that all of the people shot by police since Chasse's death were suffering from some kinds of mental illness or addiction. And he remains convinced that all police officers need to be skilled in crisis intervention.

"The majority of people arrested – maybe 70 – 80 percent is dealing with active mental illness or addictions," he said. "What we've done is dismantle the community mental health system, and those people now flow, without much intervention into our criminal justice system. Police officers are caught in the middle and they resent it. Our job is to make sure police officers have the tools to do their job."

"We believe all officers should be trained. All officers should be held accountable to the same standards. If they can't be trained then they shouldn't be police officers."

Jo Ann Hardesty said the figures are incomplete. Police often stop and search people – in particular youth of color –but do not record the stops, because they are seen as informal, "walk and talks."

"The DOJ said they have to record them because they inhibit people's liberty and have the same impact as formal stops," she said. "But I haven't seen anything from the chief on how they are going to do that."

In addition, Hardesty said, the crisis team should not be made up of just any officer; it should be the officers who are best suited psychologically for the work.

"We don't even have a psychological profile of the best person to supervise that unit," she said. "It can't just be business as usual."


Recently Published by The Skanner News

  • Default
  • Title
  • Date
  • Random
  • WASHINGTON (AP) — One month after the inauguration, the stretch of Pennsylvania Avenue in front of Donald Trump's White House still is a hard-hat zone. Skeletal remains of the inaugural reviewing stands poke skyward. Random piles of plywood and cables are heaped on the ground inside crooked lines of metal fencing. The disarray outside the president's front door, though not his fault, serves as a metaphor for the tumult still unfolding inside. Four weeks in, the man who says he inherited "a mess" at home and abroad is presiding over a White House that is widely described as itself being a mess. At a stunning pace, Trump has riled world leaders and frustrated allies. He was dealt a bruising legal blow on one of his signature policies. He lost his national security adviser and his pick for labor secretary to scandal. He's seen forces within his government push back against his policies and leak confidential information. All of this has played out amid a steady drip of revelations about an FBI investigation into his campaign's contacts with Russian intelligence officials. Trump says his administration is running like a "fine-tuned machine." He points to the rising stock market and the devotion of his still-loyal supporters as evidence that all is well, although his job approval rating is much lower than that for prior presidents in their first weeks in office. Stung by the unrelenting criticism coming his way, Trump dismisses much of it as "fake news" delivered by "the enemy of the people" — aka the press. Daily denunciations of the media are just one of the new White House fixtures Americans are adjusting to. Most days start (and end) with presidential tweets riffing off of whatever's on TV talk shows or teasing coming events or hurling insults at the media. At some point in the day, count on Trump to cast back to the marvels of his upset of Democrat Hillary Clinton in the November election and quite possibly overstate his margins of support. Expect more denunciations of the "dishonest" press and its "fake news." From there, things can veer in unexpected directions as Trump offers up policy pronouncements or offhand remarks that leave even White House aides struggling to interpret them. The long-standing U.S. policy of seeking a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Trump this past week offered this cryptic pronouncement: "I'm looking at two-state and one-state, and I like the one that both parties like. I can live with either one." His U.N. ambassador, Nikki Haley, the next day insisted, "We absolutely support a two-state solution." Trump's days are busy. Outside groups troop in for "listening sessions." Foreign leaders call or come to visit. (Or, in the case of Mexico's president, cancel out in pique over Trump's talk about the planned border wall.) After the president signed two dozen executive actions, the White House was awaiting a rush order of more of the gold-plated Cross pens that Trump prefers to the chrome-plated ones used by his predecessor. Trump hands them out as souvenirs at the signing ceremonies that he points to as evidence of his ambitious pace. "This last month has represented an unprecedented degree of action on behalf of the great citizens of our country," Trump said at a Thursday news conference. "Again, I say it. There has never been a presidency that's done so much in such a short period of time." That's all music to the ears of his followers, who sent him to Washington to upend the established order and play the role of disrupter. "I can't believe there's actually a politician doing what he says he would do," says an approving Scott Hiltgen, a 66-year-old office furniture sales broker from River Falls, Wisconsin. "That never happens." Disrupt Trump has. But there may be more sound and fury than substance to many of his early actions. Trump did select Judge Neil Gorsuch to replace the late Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court, a nomination that has drawn strong reviews from conservatives. But the president is regrouping on immigration after federal judges blocked his order to suspend the United States' refugee program and ban visitors from seven Muslim-majority countries, which had caused chaos for travelers around the globe. Some other orders on issues such as the U.S.-Mexico border wall and former President Barack Obama's health care law are of limited effect. Trump says his early actions show he means to deliver on the promises he made during the campaign. "A lot of people say, 'Oh, oh, Trump was only kidding with the wall,'" the president told a group of police chiefs recently. "I wasn't kidding. I don't kid." But the Republican-led Congress is still waiting to see specifics on how Trump wants to proceed legislatively on top initiatives such as replacing the health care law, enacting tax cuts and revising trade deals. The messy rollout of the travel ban and tumult over the ouster of national security adviser Michael Flynn for misrepresenting his contacts with Russia are part of a broader state of disarray as different figures in Trump's White House jockey for power and leaks reveal internal discord in the machinations of the presidency. "I thought by now you'd at least hear the outlines of domestic legislation like tax cuts," says Princeton historian Julian Zelizer. "But a lot of that has slowed. Trump shouldn't mistake the fact that some of his supporters like his style with the fact that a lot of Republicans just want the policies he promised them. He has to deliver that." Put Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., in the camp of those more interested in substance than style. "I'm not a great fan of daily tweets," McConnell said Friday, referring to the "extra discussion" that Trump likes to engage in. But McConnell was quick to add: "What I am a fan of is what he's been actually doing." He credits Trump with assembling a conservative Cabinet and taking steps to reduce government regulation, and promised: "We like his positions and we're going to pursue them as vigorously as we can." The challenge may be to tease out exactly what Trump wants in the way of a health care plan, tax changes and trade policy. At his long and defiant news conference on Thursday, Trump tried to dispel the impression of a White House in crisis, squarely blaming the press for keeping him from moving forward more decisively on his agenda. Pointing to his chief of staff, Reince Priebus, Trump said, "You take a look at Reince, he's working so hard just putting out fires that are fake fires. I mean, they're fake. They're not true. And isn't that a shame because he'd rather be working on health care, he'd rather be working on tax reform." For all the frustrations of his early days as president, Trump still seems tickled by the trappings of his office. When New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie visited the White House last week to discuss the national opioid epidemic over lunch, the governor said Trump informed him: "Chris, you and I are going to have the meatloaf.'" Trump added: "I'm telling you, the meatloaf is fabulous." ___Follow Nancy Benac on Twitter at http://twitter.com/nbenac
    Read More
  • FDR executive order sent 120,000 Japanese immigrants and citizens into camps
    Read More
  • Pruitt's nomination was strongly opposed by environmental groups and hundreds of former EPA employees
    Read More
load morehold SHIFT key to load allload all
Oregon Lottery
Carpentry Professionals


Reed College Jobs
His Eye is on the Sparrow