02-19-2017  10:29 pm      •     
McMenamins

It all started with a simple question. Nearly 24 years ago, two women from Denver wanted to know why the city of Portland didn't have a street named for Martin Luther King Jr.

Bernie Foster, publisher of The Skanner News, didn't know what to tell the two ladies, whose names have been long forgotten.
"So, we put a flier in the paper and ran it for a couple of weeks," he said.
Along with several volunteers from the community, The Skanner's call for action drew in about 4,000 signatures in support of a plan to rename a street in Portland after Martin Luther King Jr.
This year marks the 35th anniversary for The Skanner News Group, which published its first edition in October 1975. Over the decades, The Skanner News has operated like few other papers – with a mission statement: "Challenging People to Shape a Better Future Now."
This mission accompanies the many projects the newspaper's owners and staff have undertaken. One of the most visible and ambitious was the renaming of Union Avenue to Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard that took place from the fall of 1986 to May of 1989.
But like other challenges faced by The Skanner, honoring Martin Luther King Jr. was no easy task. In many ways, the struggle by a group of dedicated citizens mirrored the attempt to name a Portland street after Hispanic civil rights icon Cesar Chavez.

In autumn of 1986, the city had no mechanism to rename a street. So when The Skanner Newspaper presented the city with a petition to rename a street in honor of King, they created one. And Foster helped created an all-star committee to make it happen.
"We picked people for their expertise," he said.
He went to Carolyn Leonard (pictured at left) and the late William Little, of Portland State University to head the committee. Others were picked for their skills and connections to the community, including Trail Blazers President Harry Glickman, Rev. John Jackson, Neil Kelly, Attorney Monica Little (see pic below), and others.

Committee member Kathleen Sadaat, who was working as Gov. Neil Goldschmidt's director of affirmative action, said the street project was about more than symbolism, it was acknowledging the shared history between races.
"The concrete manifestation of his greatness was not looked at as a positive thing by some people," Sadaat said. "There was a lot of hostility around the name change. People felt like history was being stolen."
Leonard, who worked as Portland Public Schools' coordinator for multicultural/multiethnic education, says objections were raised to the project nearly as soon as they would recommend a street to rename.
Fifth Avenue wouldn't work. The bankers and businessmen saw to that.
Front Avenue was out of the question. Citizens said it carried too much history behind it. It was later renamed Naito Parkway, after developer Bill Naito, with little objection.
And Union Avenue – named in honor of the Union's victory over the South? Most businesses objected to changing the name. Even some African Americans said it was a bad idea. At the time, the strip was in disrepair and was not considered to be a good part of town.
But the committee had done several things right. They were all well-connected, educated people; they had the support of city hall; and they followed the city's newly created street renaming guidelines.
Foster says Union Avenue was also a perfect choice because it was visible.
"It was one of the biggest arterial streets in the city," he said. "Every state map would have it."
Interstate 5 would have large signs for the off-ramp, and the Oregon Convention Center being proposed, would have an address with the civil rights leader's name right on it.
Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Portland, was a newly elected city commissioner in charge of public works at the time. He says he and others worked very hard to get the council and Mayor Bud Clark to unanimously support the proposal. He still doesn't think Clark gets the recognition he deserves for his support of the plan.
Community meetings about the proposal were contentious, with large showings of support and opposition for the idea.
"You didn't have to scratch the surface very deeply to see the hostility and continued racism," Blumenauer told The Skanner News. "It was a window into Portland's struggle to come to grips with a past that wasn't very savory."
The present time wasn't very savory for many of the main proponents of the renaming, either. Foster got numerous threats and someone twice broke the window of The Skanner News office; Leonard said she felt a sense of danger, always looking under her car and making sure no one was following her when she would make solo trips to Salem.
Foster said they had an organized public relations campaign, even going to the length of putting only female African Americans on television.
"No Black males should be on camera, especially if they were real dark, big lips, look like soldiers, warriors," he said. "So we give 'em all the ladies … nice, non-confrontational. We had Carolyn Leonard and Monica Little."
As soon as Union Avenue became the most likely choice for the renaming, businesses formed Citizens for Union Avenue. Foster said he printed the names of businesses that donated money to the cause. Of the 848 surveys sent to tenants and businesses on Union, only 286 were returned. Only 42 supported the change.
Businesses warned they might go belly up having to print new stationary, despite a city rule that left Union Avenue signs up 5 years following a street name change.
But with enough public support and coordination in city hall, business opposition didn't matter.
And another thing happened, according to Foster. One of the main opposition parties – the Barretts – had allegedly invited Klan icon David Duke to dinner to discuss the opposition's tactics.
"That really changed a lot of people's minds," he said.
A TV news crew came to interview Foster about that and asked him 'do you think the Barrett's are racist?"
"In those days, one thing a Black male couldn't do was go on TV and say 'yeah,'" Foster said. "So I said, 'Racist? I don't know if they're racist or not, I think Oregonians can solve their own problems. We just have a difference of opinion.' Hell yeah they were racist, but I couldn't say it."
After the council voted unanimously on April 27, 1989 to support the name change, one manufacturing business on Ainsworth and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard decided to take drastic action.
"He was so incensed that he changed the address of his building to that of the side street," Blumenauer said. "This was a respected business person. I will believe to my dying day that it was because of racism."
The opposition decided to take the case to court. Leonard said the case hinged on whether or not the city council had the authority to change the street's name. William Little's wife, attorney and committee member Monica Little helped formulate the proponent's case. In the end, the Oregon Supreme Court ruled in favor of the city.
Foster said there were other big players watching the case at the time. He said he received the full backing of a firm that was worried about losing a $20 million government contract should the case lose, because it would have affected the decision-making powers of nearly every municipality in the state.
Blumenauer credits the committee with their professionalism and dedication for getting the job done right, but says following the city's criteria for street renaming was essential – a process not followed in the Portland Boulevard/Rosa Parks Way and the Cesar Chavez Way campaigns.
Carolyn Leonard says that although the Union discussions were difficult, never did she feel as sickened by those meetings as she did when hearing the opposition to Cesar Chavez Way renaming.
In the end, the renaming of Union Avenue was more than symbolism. Blumenauer said it gave the community an extra incentive to revitalize the troubled area.
Sadaat said it's a way different way to teach children our collective history.
"One day, some kid is going to say, who was Martin Luther King?" she said.
In the end, the ordeal personally cost Foster $11,000. It was money well spent, he said.

 

Recently Published by The Skanner News

  • Default
  • Title
  • Date
  • Random
  • WASHINGTON (AP) — One month after the inauguration, the stretch of Pennsylvania Avenue in front of Donald Trump's White House still is a hard-hat zone. Skeletal remains of the inaugural reviewing stands poke skyward. Random piles of plywood and cables are heaped on the ground inside crooked lines of metal fencing. The disarray outside the president's front door, though not his fault, serves as a metaphor for the tumult still unfolding inside. Four weeks in, the man who says he inherited "a mess" at home and abroad is presiding over a White House that is widely described as itself being a mess. At a stunning pace, Trump has riled world leaders and frustrated allies. He was dealt a bruising legal blow on one of his signature policies. He lost his national security adviser and his pick for labor secretary to scandal. He's seen forces within his government push back against his policies and leak confidential information. All of this has played out amid a steady drip of revelations about an FBI investigation into his campaign's contacts with Russian intelligence officials. Trump says his administration is running like a "fine-tuned machine." He points to the rising stock market and the devotion of his still-loyal supporters as evidence that all is well, although his job approval rating is much lower than that for prior presidents in their first weeks in office. Stung by the unrelenting criticism coming his way, Trump dismisses much of it as "fake news" delivered by "the enemy of the people" — aka the press. Daily denunciations of the media are just one of the new White House fixtures Americans are adjusting to. Most days start (and end) with presidential tweets riffing off of whatever's on TV talk shows or teasing coming events or hurling insults at the media. At some point in the day, count on Trump to cast back to the marvels of his upset of Democrat Hillary Clinton in the November election and quite possibly overstate his margins of support. Expect more denunciations of the "dishonest" press and its "fake news." From there, things can veer in unexpected directions as Trump offers up policy pronouncements or offhand remarks that leave even White House aides struggling to interpret them. The long-standing U.S. policy of seeking a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Trump this past week offered this cryptic pronouncement: "I'm looking at two-state and one-state, and I like the one that both parties like. I can live with either one." His U.N. ambassador, Nikki Haley, the next day insisted, "We absolutely support a two-state solution." Trump's days are busy. Outside groups troop in for "listening sessions." Foreign leaders call or come to visit. (Or, in the case of Mexico's president, cancel out in pique over Trump's talk about the planned border wall.) After the president signed two dozen executive actions, the White House was awaiting a rush order of more of the gold-plated Cross pens that Trump prefers to the chrome-plated ones used by his predecessor. Trump hands them out as souvenirs at the signing ceremonies that he points to as evidence of his ambitious pace. "This last month has represented an unprecedented degree of action on behalf of the great citizens of our country," Trump said at a Thursday news conference. "Again, I say it. There has never been a presidency that's done so much in such a short period of time." That's all music to the ears of his followers, who sent him to Washington to upend the established order and play the role of disrupter. "I can't believe there's actually a politician doing what he says he would do," says an approving Scott Hiltgen, a 66-year-old office furniture sales broker from River Falls, Wisconsin. "That never happens." Disrupt Trump has. But there may be more sound and fury than substance to many of his early actions. Trump did select Judge Neil Gorsuch to replace the late Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court, a nomination that has drawn strong reviews from conservatives. But the president is regrouping on immigration after federal judges blocked his order to suspend the United States' refugee program and ban visitors from seven Muslim-majority countries, which had caused chaos for travelers around the globe. Some other orders on issues such as the U.S.-Mexico border wall and former President Barack Obama's health care law are of limited effect. Trump says his early actions show he means to deliver on the promises he made during the campaign. "A lot of people say, 'Oh, oh, Trump was only kidding with the wall,'" the president told a group of police chiefs recently. "I wasn't kidding. I don't kid." But the Republican-led Congress is still waiting to see specifics on how Trump wants to proceed legislatively on top initiatives such as replacing the health care law, enacting tax cuts and revising trade deals. The messy rollout of the travel ban and tumult over the ouster of national security adviser Michael Flynn for misrepresenting his contacts with Russia are part of a broader state of disarray as different figures in Trump's White House jockey for power and leaks reveal internal discord in the machinations of the presidency. "I thought by now you'd at least hear the outlines of domestic legislation like tax cuts," says Princeton historian Julian Zelizer. "But a lot of that has slowed. Trump shouldn't mistake the fact that some of his supporters like his style with the fact that a lot of Republicans just want the policies he promised them. He has to deliver that." Put Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., in the camp of those more interested in substance than style. "I'm not a great fan of daily tweets," McConnell said Friday, referring to the "extra discussion" that Trump likes to engage in. But McConnell was quick to add: "What I am a fan of is what he's been actually doing." He credits Trump with assembling a conservative Cabinet and taking steps to reduce government regulation, and promised: "We like his positions and we're going to pursue them as vigorously as we can." The challenge may be to tease out exactly what Trump wants in the way of a health care plan, tax changes and trade policy. At his long and defiant news conference on Thursday, Trump tried to dispel the impression of a White House in crisis, squarely blaming the press for keeping him from moving forward more decisively on his agenda. Pointing to his chief of staff, Reince Priebus, Trump said, "You take a look at Reince, he's working so hard just putting out fires that are fake fires. I mean, they're fake. They're not true. And isn't that a shame because he'd rather be working on health care, he'd rather be working on tax reform." For all the frustrations of his early days as president, Trump still seems tickled by the trappings of his office. When New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie visited the White House last week to discuss the national opioid epidemic over lunch, the governor said Trump informed him: "Chris, you and I are going to have the meatloaf.'" Trump added: "I'm telling you, the meatloaf is fabulous." ___Follow Nancy Benac on Twitter at http://twitter.com/nbenac
    Read More
  • FDR executive order sent 120,000 Japanese immigrants and citizens into camps
    Read More
  • Pruitt's nomination was strongly opposed by environmental groups and hundreds of former EPA employees
    Read More
load morehold SHIFT key to load allload all
Oregon Lottery
Carpentry Professionals
Calendar

PHOTO GALLERY

Reed College Jobs
His Eye is on the Sparrow